This provider's $11.3M in total Medicare payments ranks in the 97th percentile of Portable X-Ray Supplier providers nationally.
Medicare payments to this provider grew 233% from 2016 to 2023.
66% of their billing comes from a single procedure code (R0070 — Transportation of portable x-ray equipment and personnel to home or nursing home, per trip to facility or location, one patient seen).
AI-generated analysis based on Medicare payment data.
Notable: Payments increased 195% in 2017
Year-over-year payment surges can indicate changes in practice volume, new services, or billing pattern shifts.
Average per-service amounts submitted by the provider compared to what Medicare actually paid — the gap represents the markup.
| Year | Avg Submitted | Avg Paid | Markup Ratio | Gap per Service | Total Payments | Services | Beneficiaries |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | $50.54 | $30.20 | 1.67x | $20.34 | $392.5K | 6.6K | 5.1K |
| 2017 | $48.85 | $28.63 | 1.71x | $20.22 | $1.2M | 19.8K | 13.9K |
| 2018 | $49.61 | $28.93 | 1.71x | $20.68 | $1.6M | 29.2K | 21.9K |
| 2019 | $48.13 | $30.02 | 1.60x | $18.11 | $2.5M | 42.3K | 29.8K |
| 2020 | $51.77 | $32.83 | 1.58x | $18.94 | $1.9M | 32.0K | 22.8K |
| 2021 | $61.98 | $34.84 | 1.78x | $27.14 | $1.3M | 21.6K | 15.8K |
| 2022 | $61.80 | $33.67 | 1.84x | $28.13 | $1.1M | 19.4K | 14.9K |
| 2023 | $64.01 | $36.69 | 1.74x | $27.32 | $1.3M | 21.2K | 15.3K |
| Code | Description | Services | Payments | Avg/Service | Markup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R0070 | Transportation of portable x-ray equipment and personnel to home or nursing home, per trip to facility or location, one patient seen | 42.7K | $7.2M | $169.58 | 1.40x |
| Q0092 | Set-up portable x-ray equipment | 59.9K | $1.2M | $20.22 | 1.71x |
| R0075 | Transportation of portable x-ray equipment and personnel to home or nursing home, per trip to facility or location, more than one patient seen | 16.8K | $1.2M | $70.37 | 1.44x |
| 71045 | X-ray of chest, 1 view | 22.7K | $437.4K | $19.29 | 2.03x |
| 71046 | X-ray of chest, 2 views | 5.8K | $147.7K | $25.48 | 1.98x |
| 74018 | X-ray of abdomen, 1 view | 4.6K | $111.6K | $24.42 | 1.72x |
| 73502 | X-ray of hip with pelvis, 2-3 views | 2.8K | $100.2K | $35.91 | 1.69x |
| 71010 | X-ray of chest, 1 view, front | 4.2K | $73.8K | $17.53 | 2.25x |
| 72100 | X-ray of lower and sacral spine, 2 or 3 views | 2.2K | $68.3K | $30.44 | 1.78x |
| 73560 | X-ray of knee, 1 or 2 views | 2.5K | $66.3K | $26.20 | 1.64x |
| 73030 | X-ray of shoulder, minimum of 2 views | 1.9K | $50.9K | $26.59 | 1.80x |
| 73562 | X-ray of knee, 3 views | 1.1K | $35.6K | $31.61 | 1.73x |
| 73501 | X-ray of hip with pelvis, 1 view | 1.4K | $34.3K | $24.00 | 1.66x |
| 73620 | X-ray of foot, 2 views | 1.4K | $31.4K | $22.17 | 1.75x |
| 73120 | X-ray of hand, 2 views | 1.3K | $31.1K | $23.91 | 1.76x |
| 73600 | X-ray of ankle, 2 views | 1.1K | $27.7K | $25.18 | 1.69x |
| 93005 | Routine electrocardiogram (EKG) with tracing using at least 12 leads | 4.2K | $27.0K | $6.39 | 2.94x |
| 73521 | X-ray of both hips with pelvis, 2 views | 805 | $25.2K | $31.31 | 2.04x |
| 73590 | X-ray of lower leg, 2 views | 1.0K | $24.7K | $24.69 | 1.72x |
| 73100 | X-ray of wrist, 2 views | 956 | $24.6K | $25.75 | 1.58x |
This provider submits charges 1.51 times higher than what Medicare actually pays.
A markup ratio of 1.51x means for every $100 Medicare pays, this provider initially charges $151. This is lower than the national average.
Always verify provider credentials and location before scheduling appointments. This data reflects Medicare payments and may not include all practice locations.
Other Portable X-Ray Supplier providers in CA for peer comparison.
| Provider | Location | Total Payments | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kan-Di-Ki Llc | North Hollywood, CA | $116.0M | ✓ Clear |
Share this provider's Medicare payment information
Last Updated: February 2026 (data through 2023, the latest CMS release)
Note: All data is from publicly available Medicare records. OpenMedicare is an independent journalism project not affiliated with CMS.
Believe this data is inaccurate? Dispute this data