This provider's $6.5M in total Medicare payments ranks in the 91th percentile of Radiation Therapy Center providers nationally.
This provider's billing patterns fall within normal ranges for their specialty.
AI-generated analysis based on Medicare payment data.
Average per-service amounts submitted by the provider compared to what Medicare actually paid — the gap represents the markup.
| Year | Avg Submitted | Avg Paid | Markup Ratio | Gap per Service | Total Payments | Services | Beneficiaries |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | $1.0K | $240.65 | 4.25x | $782.81 | $579.8K | 3.4K | 515 |
| 2015 | $908.20 | $212.53 | 4.27x | $695.67 | $650.8K | 4.0K | 710 |
| 2016 | $908.20 | $215.11 | 4.22x | $693.09 | $694.1K | 4.2K | 730 |
| 2017 | $871.81 | $208.21 | 4.19x | $663.60 | $760.5K | 4.7K | 666 |
| 2018 | $954.21 | $229.50 | 4.16x | $724.71 | $585.5K | 3.6K | 597 |
| 2019 | $970.87 | $238.92 | 4.06x | $731.95 | $708.3K | 4.4K | 634 |
| 2020 | $920.36 | $221.95 | 4.15x | $698.41 | $702.1K | 4.3K | 635 |
| 2021 | $954.21 | $226.86 | 4.21x | $727.35 | $651.8K | 3.7K | 587 |
| 2022 | $1.0K | $245.35 | 4.27x | $801.90 | $494.8K | 2.9K | 437 |
| 2023 | $920.36 | $213.30 | 4.31x | $707.06 | $720.6K | 4.5K | 610 |
| Code | Description | Services | Payments | Avg/Service | Markup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G6015 | Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session | 9.3K | $2.7M | $290.96 | 5.00x |
| 77014 | CT scan guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields | 14.3K | $878.3K | $61.38 | 6.81x |
| G6013 | Radiation treatment delivery,3 or more separate treatment areas, custom blocking, tangential ports, wedges, rotational beam, compensators, electron beam; 11-19mev | 3.3K | $693.6K | $208.37 | 3.52x |
| G6012 | Radiation treatment delivery,3 or more separate treatment areas, custom blocking, tangential ports, wedges, rotational beam, compensators, electron beam; 6-10mev | 2.9K | $589.9K | $204.62 | 3.21x |
| 77301 | Management of modulation radiotherapy planning | 383 | $462.9K | $1.2K | 3.90x |
| 77418 | Intensity modulated radiation treatment delivery per session | 914 | $286.9K | $313.89 | 4.63x |
| 77290 | Management of radiation therapy, simulation, complex | 666 | $226.5K | $340.07 | 3.72x |
| 77336 | Radiation therapy consultation per week | 3.3K | $208.9K | $63.87 | 3.01x |
| 77338 | Design and construction of device for radiation therapy | 482 | $103.7K | $215.23 | 3.40x |
| 77280 | Management of radiation therapy simulation, simple | 534 | $102.7K | $192.35 | 2.24x |
| 77295 | Management of radiation therapy, 3D | 382 | $81.6K | $213.56 | 7.51x |
| 77334 | Radiation treatment devices, design and construction, complex | 1.2K | $71.5K | $59.32 | 4.33x |
| 77414 | Radiation treatment delivery, three or more treatment areas | 332 | $66.6K | $200.67 | 3.66x |
| 77413 | Radiation treatment delivery, three or more treatment areas | 188 | $33.5K | $178.18 | 3.68x |
| 77300 | Calculation of radiation therapy dose | 933 | $25.3K | $27.13 | 4.02x |
| 77470 | Special radiation treatment procedure | 164 | $5.8K | $35.15 | 21.00x |
| 77331 | Special radiation therapy planning | 239 | $3.7K | $15.31 | 3.53x |
| 77321 | Radiation therapy total body port plan | 78 | $2.7K | $35.08 | 7.53x |
| 77370 | Radiation therapy consultation | 17 | $1.7K | $97.52 | 3.34x |
This provider submits charges 4.67 times higher than what Medicare actually pays.
A markup ratio of 4.67x means for every $100 Medicare pays, this provider initially charges $467. This is higher than the national average.
Always verify provider credentials and location before scheduling appointments. This data reflects Medicare payments and may not include all practice locations.
Share this provider's Medicare payment information
Last Updated: February 2026 (data through 2023, the latest CMS release)
Note: All data is from publicly available Medicare records. OpenMedicare is an independent journalism project not affiliated with CMS.
Believe this data is inaccurate? Dispute this data