This provider's $5.3M in total Medicare payments ranks in the 99th percentile of Diagnostic Radiology providers nationally.
Medicare payments to this provider grew 92% from 2014 to 2023.
AI-generated analysis based on Medicare payment data.
Notable: Payments increased 120% in 2020
Year-over-year payment surges can indicate changes in practice volume, new services, or billing pattern shifts.
Average per-service amounts submitted by the provider compared to what Medicare actually paid — the gap represents the markup.
| Year | Avg Submitted | Avg Paid | Markup Ratio | Gap per Service | Total Payments | Services | Beneficiaries |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | $868.88 | $247.62 | 3.51x | $621.26 | $484.7K | 1.5K | 1.4K |
| 2015 | $728.67 | $185.07 | 3.94x | $543.60 | $339.2K | 1.5K | 1.5K |
| 2016 | $782.89 | $207.34 | 3.78x | $575.55 | $271.4K | 1.2K | 1.2K |
| 2017 | $524.76 | $152.84 | 3.43x | $371.92 | $319.3K | 1.9K | 1.9K |
| 2018 | $504.69 | $130.08 | 3.88x | $374.61 | $380.3K | 3.5K | 3.4K |
| 2019 | $484.27 | $107.74 | 4.49x | $376.53 | $233.3K | 2.2K | 2.1K |
| 2020 | $386.77 | $90.08 | 4.29x | $296.69 | $513.0K | 7.5K | 7.5K |
| 2021 | $366.99 | $88.92 | 4.13x | $278.07 | $990.9K | 13.6K | 13.5K |
| 2022 | $332.51 | $80.14 | 4.15x | $252.37 | $820.1K | 14.2K | 14.1K |
| 2023 | $408.57 | $83.69 | 4.88x | $324.88 | $930.5K | 14.8K | 14.8K |
| Code | Description | Services | Payments | Avg/Service | Markup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77067 | Mammography of both breasts | 6.0K | $711.4K | $118.51 | 1.86x |
| 78815 | Nuclear medicine study with CT imaging skull base to mid-thigh | 505 | $649.0K | $1.3K | 2.84x |
| 72197 | MRI scan of pelvis before and after contrast | 1.5K | $574.5K | $378.47 | 4.43x |
| 77080 | Bone density measurement using dedicated X-ray machine | 12.1K | $429.3K | $35.61 | 7.30x |
| 76536 | Ultrasound of head and neck | 2.2K | $182.4K | $83.10 | 2.26x |
| 77063 | Screening digital tomography of both breasts | 5.8K | $175.8K | $30.58 | 4.25x |
| 76641 | Ultrasound of one breast | 2.0K | $160.5K | $79.64 | 2.33x |
| 74183 | MRI scan of abdomen before and after contrast | 380 | $149.5K | $393.32 | 4.12x |
| 74178 | CT scan of abdomen and pelvis before and after contrast | 453 | $140.9K | $311.03 | 3.90x |
| 72148 | MRI scan of lower spinal canal | 1.1K | $136.0K | $120.78 | 7.34x |
| 74177 | CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with contrast | 415 | $111.2K | $267.86 | 3.65x |
| A9552 | Fluorodeoxyglucose f-18 fdg, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 45 millicuries | 500 | $101.7K | $203.47 | 1.42x |
| 77085 | Bone density measurement using dedicated X-ray machine | 2.0K | $93.7K | $46.22 | 2.68x |
| 78306 | Bone and/or joint imaging, whole body | 370 | $90.7K | $245.16 | 2.50x |
| 71250 | CT scan chest | 742 | $89.1K | $120.05 | 4.62x |
| 76770 | Ultrasound behind abdominal cavity | 1.2K | $85.6K | $71.57 | 2.64x |
| 76377 | 3D radiographic procedure with computerized image postprocessing | 1.3K | $83.9K | $66.29 | 4.21x |
| 74176 | CT scan of abdomen and pelvis | 473 | $75.5K | $159.54 | 4.63x |
| 70551 | MRI scan brain | 551 | $71.0K | $128.77 | 8.05x |
| 93925 | Ultrasound study of arteries and arterial grafts of both legs | 294 | $60.7K | $206.38 | 1.79x |
This provider submits charges 3.85 times higher than what Medicare actually pays.
A markup ratio of 3.85x means for every $100 Medicare pays, this provider initially charges $385. This is higher than the national average.
Always verify provider credentials and location before scheduling appointments. This data reflects Medicare payments and may not include all practice locations.
Other Diagnostic Radiology providers in NY for peer comparison.
| Provider | Location | Total Payments | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Lodespoto, M.D. | Oceanside, NY | $34.9M | ✓ Clear |
Share this provider's Medicare payment information
Last Updated: February 2026 (data through 2023, the latest CMS release)
Note: All data is from publicly available Medicare records. OpenMedicare is an independent journalism project not affiliated with CMS.
Believe this data is inaccurate? Dispute this data