OpenMedicare
Start Here
Explore
Fraud
Investigations
Data
Tools
About

Footer

OpenMedicare

Independent Medicare data journalism

Sister Sites

  • OpenMedicaid
  • OpenFeds
  • OpenSpending

Explore

  • Providers
  • Procedures
  • States
  • Specialties
  • Search

Fraud Analysis

  • Still Out There (AI)
  • Fraud Overview
  • Fraud Watchlist
  • Deep Dive Profiles
  • Impossible Numbers
  • Report Fraud

Investigations

  • The Algorithm Knows
  • How We Built the Model
  • Internal Medicine Crisis
  • Florida & California Fraud
  • Million Dollar Flagged
  • All Investigations

Tools

  • Provider Lookup
  • Compare
  • Cost Calculator
  • Your Medicare Dollar
  • Downloads

About

  • About OpenMedicare
  • Methodology
  • Glossary
  • Data Sources
  • API Docs
  • Updates
Data Sources: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data
Disclaimer: This site is an independent journalism project. Data analysis and editorial content are not affiliated with or endorsed by CMS or any government agency. All spending figures are based on publicly available Medicare payment records.
Sister Sites: OpenMedicaid ยท OpenFeds ยท OpenSpending

ยฉ 2026 OpenMedicare. Independent data journalism. Built by TheDataProject.ai

Methodologyโ€ขDownload Data
  1. Home
  2. Providers
  3. Sundeep Dev
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ
MDIndividual

Sundeep Dev, MD

NPI: 1497744924
Minneapolis, MN
10 years of data
Ophthalmology
$34.6M
Total Payments
167
Beneficiaries
158.7K
Services
2.08x
Markup Ratio

Peer Comparison

99th
percentile in specialty
This provider$34.6M
Specialty median$383.7K
Rank #174 of 189 in specialty

๐Ÿ“‹ Key Findings

1Billed $34.6M over 10 years
22.08x markup ratio (above median)
399th percentile in Ophthalmology by payments
463 services/day โ€” unusually high
5Payments surged 72% in 2019
62 procedures with >3x markup

This provider averages 63 services per working day

Based on 158.7K total services over 10 years (250 working days/year). Learn about impossible service volumes โ†’

๐Ÿ”Ž Data Analysis

This provider's $34.6M in total Medicare payments ranks in the 99th percentile of Ophthalmology providers nationally.

Averaging 63 services per working day raises questions about billing patterns.

AI-generated analysis based on Medicare payment data.

Annual Medicare Payments

Annual Services Provided

Avg Payment per Service

Markup Ratio Over Time

๐Ÿ“ˆ

Notable: Payments increased 72% in 2019

Year-over-year payment surges can indicate changes in practice volume, new services, or billing pattern shifts.

Submitted Charges vs. Medicare Payments

Average per-service amounts submitted by the provider compared to what Medicare actually paid โ€” the gap represents the markup.

YearAvg SubmittedAvg PaidMarkup RatioGap per ServiceTotal PaymentsServicesBeneficiaries
2014$296.64$208.941.42x$87.70$3.0M14.5K20
2015$301.54$190.801.58x$110.74$2.4M12.6K15
2016$307.17$190.151.62x$117.02$2.2M11.5K16
2017$319.51$200.531.59x$118.98$2.3M11.5K16
2018$353.39$221.001.60x$132.39$2.7M12.1K15
2019$347.76$213.101.63x$134.66$4.6M21.7K18
2020$374.67$224.201.67x$150.47$4.5M20.0K18
2021$408.63$240.181.70x$168.45$4.1M17.3K18
2022$689.98$261.212.64x$428.77$4.3M16.5K14
2023$899.88$211.614.25x$688.27$4.5M21.1K17

Top Procedures (20)

J0178Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg
$17.2M
23.3K services$736.56/svc2.17x markup
J2778Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg
$10.2M
37.0K services$274.35/svc1.82x markup
67028Injection of drug into eye
$2.1M
23.5K services$90.48/svc2.54x markup
92014Established patient complete exam of visual system
$1.1M
11.8K services$92.16/svc2.01x markup
92134Imaging of retina
$917.0K
29.3K services$31.32/svc2.14x markup
92012Established patient problem focused exam of visual system
$536.2K
8.5K services$62.73/svc1.50x markup
J9035Injection, bevacizumab, 10 mg
$504.8K
8.8K services$57.18/svc2.52x markup
Q5128Injection, ranibizumab-eqrn (cimerli), biosimilar, 0.1 mg
$500.7K
2.3K services$216.57/svc2.59x markup
92235Exam of retinal blood vessels using a special camera after injection of a dye
$275.1K
2.3K services$117.41/svc1.59x markup
67041Removal of membrane of retina
$226.7K
245 services$925.36/svc1.50x markup
99204New patient office or other outpatient visit, 45-59 minutes
$167.2K
1.4K services$121.13/svc1.90x markup
J2777Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mgโš  4.3x markup
$153.3K
5.3K services$29.04/svc4.32x markup
67042Removal of membrane of retina with removal of internal limiting membrane of retina
$135.3K
143 services$946.47/svc1.54x markup
92250Photography of the retina
$106.2K
2.4K services$44.60/svc1.52x markup
67108Repair of detached retina with drainage and removal of eye fluid between lens and retina
$93.9K
98 services$958.63/svc1.80x markup
67113Repair of detached retina and drainage of eye fluid between lens and retina
$85.2K
78 services$1.1K/svc1.32x markup
J3590Unclassified biologicsโš  3.5x markup
$66.6K
194 services$343.18/svc3.47x markup
J3490Unclassified drugs
$60.1K
34 services$1.8K/svc2.52x markup
67210Laser destruction of retinal growth, 1 or more sessions
$41.5K
102 services$406.47/svc1.33x markup
J2781Injection, pegcetacoplan, intravitreal, 1 mg
$39.7K
330 services$120.36/svc2.47x markup
Show detailed table โ–พ
CodeDescriptionServicesPaymentsAvg/ServiceMarkup
J0178Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg23.3K$17.2M$736.562.17x
J2778Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg37.0K$10.2M$274.351.82x
67028Injection of drug into eye23.5K$2.1M$90.482.54x
92014Established patient complete exam of visual system11.8K$1.1M$92.162.01x
92134Imaging of retina29.3K$917.0K$31.322.14x
92012Established patient problem focused exam of visual system8.5K$536.2K$62.731.50x
J9035Injection, bevacizumab, 10 mg8.8K$504.8K$57.182.52x
Q5128Injection, ranibizumab-eqrn (cimerli), biosimilar, 0.1 mg2.3K$500.7K$216.572.59x
92235Exam of retinal blood vessels using a special camera after injection of a dye2.3K$275.1K$117.411.59x
67041Removal of membrane of retina245$226.7K$925.361.50x
99204New patient office or other outpatient visit, 45-59 minutes1.4K$167.2K$121.131.90x
J2777Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg5.3K$153.3K$29.044.32x
67042Removal of membrane of retina with removal of internal limiting membrane of retina143$135.3K$946.471.54x
92250Photography of the retina2.4K$106.2K$44.601.52x
67108Repair of detached retina with drainage and removal of eye fluid between lens and retina98$93.9K$958.631.80x
67113Repair of detached retina and drainage of eye fluid between lens and retina78$85.2K$1.1K1.32x
J3590Unclassified biologics194$66.6K$343.183.47x
J3490Unclassified drugs34$60.1K$1.8K2.52x
67210Laser destruction of retinal growth, 1 or more sessions102$41.5K$406.471.33x
J2781Injection, pegcetacoplan, intravitreal, 1 mg330$39.7K$120.362.47x

Markup Analysis

Charge-to-Payment Ratio

2.08x

This provider submits charges 2.08 times higher than what Medicare actually pays.

What This Means

A markup ratio of 2.08x means for every $100 Medicare pays, this provider initially charges $208. This is higher than the national average.

Location

Minneapolis, MN

Provider Verification

Always verify provider credentials and location before scheduling appointments. This data reflects Medicare payments and may not include all practice locations.

Similar Providers

Other Ophthalmology providers in MN for peer comparison.

Sundeep Dev (you)
$34.6M
David Williams, MD
$42.6M
Show detailed table โ–พ
ProviderLocationTotal PaymentsStatus
David Williams, MDEdina, MN$42.6Mโœ“ Clear

Related

Browse
โ† Back to Provider Directory
State
All providers in MN โ†’
Specialty
All Ophthalmology providers โ†’
Tool
Compare this provider โ†’
Analysis
Fraud Watchlist โ†’
Search
Search all providers โ†’

Share This Provider

Share this provider's Medicare payment information

Share:

Data Sources

  • โ€ข Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
  • โ€ข Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data (2014-2023)
  • โ€ข National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES)

Last Updated: February 2026 (data through 2023, the latest CMS release)

Note: All data is from publicly available Medicare records. OpenMedicare is an independent journalism project not affiliated with CMS.

Believe this data is inaccurate? Dispute this data