This provider's $7.5M in total Medicare payments ranks in the 95th percentile of Portable X-Ray Supplier providers nationally.
Medicare payments to this provider grew 183% from 2014 to 2023.
76% of their billing comes from a single procedure code (R0070 — Transportation of portable x-ray equipment and personnel to home or nursing home, per trip to facility or location, one patient seen).
AI-generated analysis based on Medicare payment data.
Average per-service amounts submitted by the provider compared to what Medicare actually paid — the gap represents the markup.
| Year | Avg Submitted | Avg Paid | Markup Ratio | Gap per Service | Total Payments | Services | Beneficiaries |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | $126.67 | $32.93 | 3.85x | $93.74 | $349.1K | 5.3K | 4.3K |
| 2015 | $130.13 | $29.73 | 4.38x | $100.40 | $506.7K | 7.6K | 5.8K |
| 2016 | $136.36 | $31.21 | 4.37x | $105.15 | $645.5K | 9.7K | 7.4K |
| 2017 | $137.31 | $32.01 | 4.29x | $105.30 | $680.7K | 10.1K | 8.0K |
| 2018 | $142.42 | $32.13 | 4.43x | $110.29 | $750.0K | 10.9K | 8.8K |
| 2019 | $147.97 | $33.59 | 4.41x | $114.38 | $756.0K | 10.8K | 8.8K |
| 2020 | $148.15 | $34.83 | 4.25x | $113.32 | $880.6K | 12.4K | 10.1K |
| 2021 | $146.52 | $35.81 | 4.09x | $110.71 | $938.5K | 13.0K | 10.6K |
| 2022 | $147.93 | $37.14 | 3.98x | $110.79 | $986.6K | 13.1K | 10.9K |
| 2023 | $150.74 | $37.65 | 4.00x | $113.09 | $989.7K | 12.4K | 10.4K |
| Code | Description | Services | Payments | Avg/Service | Markup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R0070 | Transportation of portable x-ray equipment and personnel to home or nursing home, per trip to facility or location, one patient seen | 32.0K | $5.6M | $174.26 | 2.87x |
| Q0092 | Set-up portable x-ray equipment | 31.9K | $724.8K | $22.69 | 3.75x |
| 71046 | X-ray of chest, 2 views | 12.4K | $362.0K | $29.27 | 6.32x |
| 71020 | X-ray of chest, 2 views, front and side | 6.1K | $153.0K | $24.96 | 7.41x |
| 73502 | X-ray of hip with pelvis, 2-3 views | 1.9K | $77.8K | $39.93 | 2.75x |
| 72100 | X-ray of lower and sacral spine, 2 or 3 views | 2.2K | $75.2K | $33.78 | 2.96x |
| 73562 | X-ray of knee, 3 views | 2.1K | $73.0K | $35.23 | 3.97x |
| 73030 | X-ray of shoulder, minimum of 2 views | 1.9K | $53.7K | $28.59 | 2.97x |
| 73630 | X-ray of foot, minimum of 3 views | 1.4K | $40.4K | $29.10 | 4.64x |
| 73610 | X-ray of ankle, minimum of 3 views | 1.1K | $34.1K | $31.34 | 3.19x |
| 73130 | X-ray of hand, minimum of 3 views | 931 | $29.0K | $31.10 | 4.08x |
| 73521 | X-ray of both hips with pelvis, 2 views | 775 | $28.1K | $36.20 | 6.91x |
| 73110 | X-ray of wrist, minimum of 3 views | 801 | $27.8K | $34.75 | 5.18x |
| 72040 | X-ray of spine of neck, 2 or 3 views | 567 | $18.6K | $32.81 | 3.66x |
| 73552 | X-ray of femur, minimum 2 views | 558 | $17.3K | $31.09 | 4.34x |
| 72070 | X-ray of middle spine, 3 views | 565 | $16.7K | $29.64 | 4.39x |
| 73590 | X-ray of lower leg, 2 views | 553 | $15.0K | $27.08 | 5.54x |
| 93005 | Routine electrocardiogram (EKG) with tracing using at least 12 leads | 2.1K | $14.9K | $7.03 | 14.23x |
| 73560 | X-ray of knee, 1 or 2 views | 507 | $13.8K | $27.23 | 4.77x |
| 73060 | X-ray of upper arm, minimum of 2 views | 467 | $12.9K | $27.69 | 3.25x |
This provider submits charges 3.33 times higher than what Medicare actually pays.
A markup ratio of 3.33x means for every $100 Medicare pays, this provider initially charges $333. This is higher than the national average.
Always verify provider credentials and location before scheduling appointments. This data reflects Medicare payments and may not include all practice locations.
Other Portable X-Ray Supplier providers in CA for peer comparison.
| Provider | Location | Total Payments | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kan-Di-Ki Llc | North Hollywood, CA | $116.0M | ✓ Clear |
Share this provider's Medicare payment information
Last Updated: February 2026 (data through 2023, the latest CMS release)
Note: All data is from publicly available Medicare records. OpenMedicare is an independent journalism project not affiliated with CMS.
Believe this data is inaccurate? Dispute this data