OpenMedicare
Start Here
Explore
Fraud
Investigations
Data
Tools
About

Footer

OpenMedicare

Independent Medicare data journalism

Sister Sites

  • OpenMedicaid
  • OpenFeds
  • OpenSpending

Explore

  • Providers
  • Procedures
  • States
  • Specialties
  • Search

Fraud Analysis

  • Still Out There (AI)
  • Fraud Overview
  • Fraud Watchlist
  • Deep Dive Profiles
  • Impossible Numbers
  • Report Fraud

Investigations

  • The Algorithm Knows
  • How We Built the Model
  • Internal Medicine Crisis
  • Florida & California Fraud
  • Million Dollar Flagged
  • All Investigations

Tools

  • Provider Lookup
  • Compare
  • Cost Calculator
  • Your Medicare Dollar
  • Downloads

About

  • About OpenMedicare
  • Methodology
  • Glossary
  • Data Sources
  • API Docs
  • Updates
Data Sources: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data
Disclaimer: This site is an independent journalism project. Data analysis and editorial content are not affiliated with or endorsed by CMS or any government agency. All spending figures are based on publicly available Medicare payment records.
Sister Sites: OpenMedicaid ยท OpenFeds ยท OpenSpending

ยฉ 2026 OpenMedicare. Independent data journalism. Built by TheDataProject.ai

Methodologyโ€ขDownload Data
  1. Home
  2. Providers
  3. Guy Bassis
๐Ÿ“ก
MDIndividual

Guy Bassis, M.D.

NPI: 1598082570
Lindenhurst, NY
10 years of data
Diagnostic Radiology
$9.5M
Total Payments
94.3K
Beneficiaries
95.2K
Services
3.57x
Markup Ratio

Peer Comparison

99th
percentile in specialty
This provider$9.5M
Specialty median$115.6K

๐Ÿ“‹ Key Findings

1Billed $9.5M over 10 years
23.57x markup ratio (above median)
399th percentile in Diagnostic Radiology by payments
4Payments surged 119% in 2022
58 procedures with >3x markup
โœ“ No flags detected

๐Ÿ”Ž Data Analysis

This provider's $9.5M in total Medicare payments ranks in the 99th percentile of Diagnostic Radiology providers nationally.

Medicare payments to this provider grew 181% from 2014 to 2023.

AI-generated analysis based on Medicare payment data.

Annual Medicare Payments

Annual Services Provided

Avg Payment per Service

Markup Ratio Over Time

๐Ÿ“ˆ

Notable: Payments increased 119% in 2022

Year-over-year payment surges can indicate changes in practice volume, new services, or billing pattern shifts.

Submitted Charges vs. Medicare Payments

Average per-service amounts submitted by the provider compared to what Medicare actually paid โ€” the gap represents the markup.

YearAvg SubmittedAvg PaidMarkup RatioGap per ServiceTotal PaymentsServicesBeneficiaries
2014$446.47$116.023.85x$330.45$541.0K6.6K6.6K
2015$530.15$137.533.85x$392.62$750.3K9.5K9.4K
2016$505.03$118.444.26x$386.59$761.1K10.1K10.0K
2017$530.51$133.853.96x$396.66$763.9K6.6K6.5K
2018$522.88$135.093.87x$387.79$703.9K6.1K6.0K
2019$722.50$145.214.98x$577.29$958.9K8.3K8.3K
2020$835.96$165.685.05x$670.28$982.7K7.6K7.6K
2021$632.06$125.785.03x$506.28$787.9K7.3K7.2K
2022$764.33$141.365.41x$622.97$1.7M17.6K17.5K
2023$738.58$138.485.33x$600.10$1.5M15.5K15.3K

Top Procedures (20)

77067Mammography of both breasts
$1.4M
8.7K services$159.50/svc1.89x markup
76641Ultrasound of one breastโš  3.6x markup
$1.1M
8.9K services$119.32/svc3.60x markup
76536Ultrasound of head and neck
$1.0M
9.6K services$104.02/svc2.78x markup
77080Bone density measurement using dedicated X-ray machineโš  5.7x markup
$933.3K
19.4K services$48.00/svc5.72x markup
G0202Screening mammography, producing direct digital image, bilateral, all views
$693.0K
4.4K services$157.43/svc1.96x markup
77063Screening digital tomography of both breasts
$598.4K
9.4K services$63.45/svc1.17x markup
77049MRI of both breasts with and without contrastโš  6.7x markup
$517.7K
1.5K services$356.51/svc6.73x markup
19083Biopsy of breast accessed throught the skin with ultrasound guidanceโš  4.4x markup
$483.7K
855 services$565.76/svc4.42x markup
76770Ultrasound behind abdominal cavity
$415.6K
4.2K services$99.87/svc2.86x markup
77059MRI scan of both breasts with contrastโš  5.0x markup
$381.8K
795 services$480.24/svc5.03x markup
76700Ultrasound of abdomen
$260.4K
2.5K services$105.09/svc2.71x markup
19081Biopsy of breast accessed throught the skin with stereotactic guidanceโš  5.2x markup
$211.3K
366 services$577.35/svc5.20x markup
77065Mammography of one breast
$154.7K
1.3K services$117.67/svc2.31x markup
77066Mammography of both breasts
$147.6K
965 services$153.00/svc2.13x markup
10005Fine needle aspiration of first lesion using ultrasound guidanceโš  10.3x markup
$133.4K
1.0K services$128.04/svc10.31x markup
76856Ultrasound of pelvisโš  3.3x markup
$122.7K
1.4K services$87.74/svc3.26x markup
G0279Diagnostic digital breast tomosynthesis, unilateral or bilateral (list separately in addition to g0204 or g0206)
$113.4K
2.2K services$50.55/svc1.52x markup
76830Ultrasound pelvis through vagina
$90.0K
804 services$111.95/svc2.97x markup
G0206Diagnostic mammography, producing direct digital image, unilateral, all views
$79.4K
696 services$114.11/svc2.40x markup
G0204Diagnostic mammography, producing direct digital image, bilateral, all views
$66.1K
450 services$147.00/svc2.23x markup
Show detailed table โ–พ
CodeDescriptionServicesPaymentsAvg/ServiceMarkup
77067Mammography of both breasts8.7K$1.4M$159.501.89x
76641Ultrasound of one breast8.9K$1.1M$119.323.60x
76536Ultrasound of head and neck9.6K$1.0M$104.022.78x
77080Bone density measurement using dedicated X-ray machine19.4K$933.3K$48.005.72x
G0202Screening mammography, producing direct digital image, bilateral, all views4.4K$693.0K$157.431.96x
77063Screening digital tomography of both breasts9.4K$598.4K$63.451.17x
77049MRI of both breasts with and without contrast1.5K$517.7K$356.516.73x
19083Biopsy of breast accessed throught the skin with ultrasound guidance855$483.7K$565.764.42x
76770Ultrasound behind abdominal cavity4.2K$415.6K$99.872.86x
77059MRI scan of both breasts with contrast795$381.8K$480.245.03x
76700Ultrasound of abdomen2.5K$260.4K$105.092.71x
19081Biopsy of breast accessed throught the skin with stereotactic guidance366$211.3K$577.355.20x
77065Mammography of one breast1.3K$154.7K$117.672.31x
77066Mammography of both breasts965$147.6K$153.002.13x
10005Fine needle aspiration of first lesion using ultrasound guidance1.0K$133.4K$128.0410.31x
76856Ultrasound of pelvis1.4K$122.7K$87.743.26x
G0279Diagnostic digital breast tomosynthesis, unilateral or bilateral (list separately in addition to g0204 or g0206)2.2K$113.4K$50.551.52x
76830Ultrasound pelvis through vagina804$90.0K$111.952.97x
G0206Diagnostic mammography, producing direct digital image, unilateral, all views696$79.4K$114.112.40x
G0204Diagnostic mammography, producing direct digital image, bilateral, all views450$66.1K$147.002.23x

Markup Analysis

Charge-to-Payment Ratio

3.57x

This provider submits charges 3.57 times higher than what Medicare actually pays.

What This Means

A markup ratio of 3.57x means for every $100 Medicare pays, this provider initially charges $357. This is higher than the national average.

Location

Lindenhurst, NY

Provider Verification

Always verify provider credentials and location before scheduling appointments. This data reflects Medicare payments and may not include all practice locations.

Similar Providers

Other Diagnostic Radiology providers in NY for peer comparison.

Guy Bassis (you)
$9.5M
Mark Lodespoto, M.D.
$34.9M
Show detailed table โ–พ
ProviderLocationTotal PaymentsStatus
Mark Lodespoto, M.D.Oceanside, NY$34.9Mโœ“ Clear

Related

Browse
โ† Back to Provider Directory
State
All providers in NY โ†’
Specialty
All Diagnostic Radiology providers โ†’
Tool
Compare this provider โ†’
Analysis
Fraud Watchlist โ†’
Search
Search all providers โ†’

Share This Provider

Share this provider's Medicare payment information

Share:

Data Sources

  • โ€ข Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
  • โ€ข Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data (2014-2023)
  • โ€ข National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES)

Last Updated: February 2026 (data through 2023, the latest CMS release)

Note: All data is from publicly available Medicare records. OpenMedicare is an independent journalism project not affiliated with CMS.

Believe this data is inaccurate? Dispute this data