This provider averages 70 services per working day
Based on 174.4K total services over 10 years (250 working days/year). Learn about impossible service volumes →
This provider's $14.3M in total Medicare payments ranks in the 99th percentile of Diagnostic Radiology providers nationally.
Averaging 70 services per working day raises questions about billing patterns.
AI-generated analysis based on Medicare payment data.
Average per-service amounts submitted by the provider compared to what Medicare actually paid — the gap represents the markup.
| Year | Avg Submitted | Avg Paid | Markup Ratio | Gap per Service | Total Payments | Services | Beneficiaries |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | $503.10 | $121.05 | 4.16x | $382.05 | $1.6M | 17.5K | 16.8K |
| 2015 | $485.93 | $111.24 | 4.37x | $374.69 | $1.4M | 16.8K | 16.2K |
| 2016 | $495.35 | $112.40 | 4.41x | $382.95 | $1.5M | 18.8K | 18.1K |
| 2017 | $494.20 | $106.96 | 4.62x | $387.24 | $1.5M | 19.0K | 18.3K |
| 2018 | $494.54 | $107.08 | 4.62x | $387.46 | $1.6M | 18.9K | 18.2K |
| 2019 | $450.54 | $99.14 | 4.54x | $351.40 | $1.6M | 19.6K | 18.9K |
| 2020 | $408.39 | $98.46 | 4.15x | $309.93 | $1.1M | 12.3K | 11.9K |
| 2021 | $427.19 | $98.49 | 4.34x | $328.70 | $1.3M | 16.2K | 15.6K |
| 2022 | $433.00 | $92.54 | 4.68x | $340.46 | $1.4M | 18.0K | 17.4K |
| 2023 | $434.28 | $86.45 | 5.02x | $347.83 | $1.3M | 17.4K | 16.9K |
| Code | Description | Services | Payments | Avg/Service | Markup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76700 | Ultrasound of abdomen | 19.1K | $1.6M | $82.23 | 2.68x |
| 77067 | Mammography of both breasts | 9.8K | $1.5M | $152.24 | 1.31x |
| G0202 | Screening mammography, producing direct digital image, bilateral, all views | 6.0K | $893.6K | $148.37 | 1.35x |
| 74178 | CT scan of abdomen and pelvis before and after contrast | 2.8K | $844.3K | $303.69 | 2.63x |
| 77080 | Bone density measurement using dedicated X-ray machine | 18.1K | $825.4K | $45.63 | 3.51x |
| 72148 | MRI scan of lower spinal canal | 3.2K | $453.8K | $142.27 | 8.25x |
| 71250 | CT scan chest | 3.8K | $422.9K | $109.98 | 6.30x |
| 93880 | Ultrasound scanning of blood flow (outside the brain) on both sides of head and neck | 2.3K | $357.1K | $155.27 | 2.58x |
| 70551 | MRI scan brain | 2.1K | $287.3K | $138.87 | 8.20x |
| 76856 | Ultrasound of pelvis | 4.3K | $284.6K | $66.34 | 3.32x |
| 75574 | CT scan of heart blood vessels and grafts with contrast dye | 1.1K | $281.4K | $264.95 | 3.77x |
| 71046 | X-ray of chest, 2 views | 12.3K | $251.0K | $20.46 | 3.76x |
| 76770 | Ultrasound behind abdominal cavity | 3.1K | $250.0K | $80.55 | 2.73x |
| 71270 | CT scan chest before and after contrast | 1.5K | $249.0K | $168.11 | 5.20x |
| 76536 | Ultrasound of head and neck | 2.9K | $232.5K | $81.55 | 2.70x |
| 70553 | MRI scan of brain before and after contrast | 932 | $229.7K | $246.50 | 9.63x |
| 74176 | CT scan of abdomen and pelvis | 1.5K | $217.2K | $147.17 | 3.06x |
| 93306 | Ultrasound examination of heart including color-depicted blood flow rate, direction, and valve function | 1.3K | $216.1K | $165.20 | 2.72x |
| 71020 | X-ray of chest, 2 views, front and side | 12.2K | $212.5K | $17.37 | 4.44x |
| 72141 | MRI scan of upper spinal canal | 1.5K | $207.4K | $140.32 | 8.36x |
This provider submits charges 3.71 times higher than what Medicare actually pays.
A markup ratio of 3.71x means for every $100 Medicare pays, this provider initially charges $371. This is higher than the national average.
Always verify provider credentials and location before scheduling appointments. This data reflects Medicare payments and may not include all practice locations.
Other Diagnostic Radiology providers in CA for peer comparison.
| Provider | Location | Total Payments | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen Liu, M.D. | Modesto, CA | $37.2M | ✓ Clear |
Share this provider's Medicare payment information
Last Updated: February 2026 (data through 2023, the latest CMS release)
Note: All data is from publicly available Medicare records. OpenMedicare is an independent journalism project not affiliated with CMS.
Believe this data is inaccurate? Dispute this data