OpenMedicare
Start Here
Explore
Fraud
Investigations
Data
Tools
About

Footer

OpenMedicare

Independent Medicare data journalism

Sister Sites

  • OpenMedicaid
  • OpenFeds
  • OpenSpending

Explore

  • Providers
  • Procedures
  • States
  • Specialties
  • Search

Fraud Analysis

  • Still Out There (AI)
  • Fraud Overview
  • Fraud Watchlist
  • Deep Dive Profiles
  • Impossible Numbers
  • Report Fraud

Investigations

  • The Algorithm Knows
  • How We Built the Model
  • Internal Medicine Crisis
  • Florida & California Fraud
  • Million Dollar Flagged
  • All Investigations

Tools

  • Provider Lookup
  • Compare
  • Cost Calculator
  • Your Medicare Dollar
  • Downloads

About

  • About OpenMedicare
  • Methodology
  • Glossary
  • Data Sources
  • API Docs
  • Updates
Data Sources: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data
Disclaimer: This site is an independent journalism project. Data analysis and editorial content are not affiliated with or endorsed by CMS or any government agency. All spending figures are based on publicly available Medicare payment records.
Sister Sites: OpenMedicaid ยท OpenFeds ยท OpenSpending

ยฉ 2026 OpenMedicare. Independent data journalism. Built by TheDataProject.ai

Methodologyโ€ขDownload Data
  1. Home
  2. Providers
  3. Reema Munir
๐Ÿ“ก
MDIndividual

Reema Munir, MD

NPI: 1679692339
Pasadena, CA
10 years of data
Diagnostic Radiology
$6.8M
Total Payments
55.8K
Beneficiaries
57.3K
Services
3.87x
Markup Ratio

Peer Comparison

99th
percentile in specialty
This provider$6.8M
Specialty median$115.6K

๐Ÿ“‹ Key Findings

1Billed $6.8M over 10 years
23.87x markup ratio (above median)
399th percentile in Diagnostic Radiology by payments
4Payments surged 66% in 2020
515 procedures with >3x markup
โœ“ No flags detected

๐Ÿ”Ž Data Analysis

This provider's $6.8M in total Medicare payments ranks in the 99th percentile of Diagnostic Radiology providers nationally.

Medicare payments to this provider grew 76% from 2014 to 2023.

AI-generated analysis based on Medicare payment data.

Annual Medicare Payments

Annual Services Provided

Avg Payment per Service

Markup Ratio Over Time

๐Ÿ“ˆ

Notable: Payments increased 66% in 2020

Year-over-year payment surges can indicate changes in practice volume, new services, or billing pattern shifts.

Submitted Charges vs. Medicare Payments

Average per-service amounts submitted by the provider compared to what Medicare actually paid โ€” the gap represents the markup.

YearAvg SubmittedAvg PaidMarkup RatioGap per ServiceTotal PaymentsServicesBeneficiaries
2014$564.58$115.374.89x$449.21$536.2K5.8K5.7K
2015$549.64$116.914.70x$432.73$629.1K6.5K6.2K
2016$553.99$115.004.82x$438.99$573.3K5.9K5.7K
2017$662.82$138.824.77x$524.00$543.7K4.4K4.3K
2018$625.21$141.264.43x$483.95$733.8K5.6K5.4K
2019$649.67$130.934.96x$518.74$426.5K3.2K3.2K
2020$603.11$124.864.83x$478.25$706.8K5.0K4.7K
2021$728.10$175.654.15x$552.45$873.2K5.9K5.8K
2022$705.86$151.904.65x$553.96$844.7K6.4K6.3K
2023$694.47$153.214.53x$541.26$945.6K8.6K8.5K

Top Procedures (20)

78815Nuclear medicine study with CT imaging skull base to mid-thigh
$1.7M
1.2K services$1.4K/svc2.94x markup
77067Mammography of both breastsโš  3.1x markup
$1.1M
6.9K services$154.48/svc3.07x markup
G0202Screening mammography, producing direct digital image, bilateral, all views
$541.5K
3.6K services$151.12/svc1.76x markup
A9552Fluorodeoxyglucose f-18 fdg, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 45 millicuries
$301.1K
1.3K services$225.52/svc2.88x markup
74177CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with contrastโš  7.4x markup
$269.8K
1.4K services$189.32/svc7.38x markup
77080Bone density measurement using dedicated X-ray machineโš  5.5x markup
$263.9K
5.7K services$46.15/svc5.45x markup
74183MRI scan of abdomen before and after contrastโš  6.2x markup
$215.5K
613 services$351.49/svc6.18x markup
77066Mammography of both breastsโš  4.9x markup
$193.1K
1.4K services$136.16/svc4.92x markup
76642Ultrasound of one breastโš  4.0x markup
$179.8K
2.4K services$75.63/svc4.04x markup
19083Biopsy of breast accessed throught the skin with ultrasound guidanceโš  4.2x markup
$149.8K
272 services$550.91/svc4.15x markup
77065Mammography of one breastโš  4.6x markup
$136.9K
1.3K services$108.13/svc4.56x markup
78812Nuclear medicine imaging from skull base to mid-thigh
$125.8K
85 services$1.5K/svc2.72x markup
77063Screening digital tomography of both breastsโš  3.1x markup
$124.0K
2.0K services$61.01/svc3.08x markup
71260CT scan chest with contrastโš  8.3x markup
$106.4K
911 services$116.79/svc8.28x markup
76700Ultrasound of abdomenโš  4.6x markup
$96.1K
1.4K services$68.43/svc4.64x markup
71250CT scan chestโš  6.8x markup
$93.0K
951 services$97.76/svc6.78x markup
G0204Diagnostic mammography, producing direct digital image, bilateral, all viewsโš  3.2x markup
$92.9K
697 services$133.29/svc3.19x markup
74176CT scan of abdomen and pelvisโš  8.4x markup
$87.8K
781 services$112.43/svc8.40x markup
76641Ultrasound of one breastโš  4.0x markup
$87.7K
844 services$103.85/svc4.05x markup
G0206Diagnostic mammography, producing direct digital image, unilateral, all views
$77.5K
710 services$109.18/svc2.90x markup
Show detailed table โ–พ
CodeDescriptionServicesPaymentsAvg/ServiceMarkup
78815Nuclear medicine study with CT imaging skull base to mid-thigh1.2K$1.7M$1.4K2.94x
77067Mammography of both breasts6.9K$1.1M$154.483.07x
G0202Screening mammography, producing direct digital image, bilateral, all views3.6K$541.5K$151.121.76x
A9552Fluorodeoxyglucose f-18 fdg, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 45 millicuries1.3K$301.1K$225.522.88x
74177CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with contrast1.4K$269.8K$189.327.38x
77080Bone density measurement using dedicated X-ray machine5.7K$263.9K$46.155.45x
74183MRI scan of abdomen before and after contrast613$215.5K$351.496.18x
77066Mammography of both breasts1.4K$193.1K$136.164.92x
76642Ultrasound of one breast2.4K$179.8K$75.634.04x
19083Biopsy of breast accessed throught the skin with ultrasound guidance272$149.8K$550.914.15x
77065Mammography of one breast1.3K$136.9K$108.134.56x
78812Nuclear medicine imaging from skull base to mid-thigh85$125.8K$1.5K2.72x
77063Screening digital tomography of both breasts2.0K$124.0K$61.013.08x
71260CT scan chest with contrast911$106.4K$116.798.28x
76700Ultrasound of abdomen1.4K$96.1K$68.434.64x
71250CT scan chest951$93.0K$97.766.78x
G0204Diagnostic mammography, producing direct digital image, bilateral, all views697$92.9K$133.293.19x
74176CT scan of abdomen and pelvis781$87.8K$112.438.40x
76641Ultrasound of one breast844$87.7K$103.854.05x
G0206Diagnostic mammography, producing direct digital image, unilateral, all views710$77.5K$109.182.90x

Markup Analysis

Charge-to-Payment Ratio

3.87x

This provider submits charges 3.87 times higher than what Medicare actually pays.

What This Means

A markup ratio of 3.87x means for every $100 Medicare pays, this provider initially charges $387. This is higher than the national average.

Location

Pasadena, CA

Provider Verification

Always verify provider credentials and location before scheduling appointments. This data reflects Medicare payments and may not include all practice locations.

Similar Providers

Other Diagnostic Radiology providers in CA for peer comparison.

Reema Munir (you)
$6.8M
Stephen Liu, M.D.
$37.2M
Show detailed table โ–พ
ProviderLocationTotal PaymentsStatus
Stephen Liu, M.D.Modesto, CA$37.2Mโœ“ Clear

Related

Browse
โ† Back to Provider Directory
State
All providers in CA โ†’
Specialty
All Diagnostic Radiology providers โ†’
Tool
Compare this provider โ†’
Analysis
Fraud Watchlist โ†’
Search
Search all providers โ†’

Share This Provider

Share this provider's Medicare payment information

Share:

Data Sources

  • โ€ข Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
  • โ€ข Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data (2014-2023)
  • โ€ข National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES)

Last Updated: February 2026 (data through 2023, the latest CMS release)

Note: All data is from publicly available Medicare records. OpenMedicare is an independent journalism project not affiliated with CMS.

Believe this data is inaccurate? Dispute this data