This provider's $28.1M in total Medicare payments ranks in the 99th percentile of Radiation Oncology providers nationally.
Their average markup ratio of 5.29x is significantly above the specialty median of 5.0x.
AI-generated analysis based on Medicare payment data.
Notable: Payments increased 82% in 2015
Year-over-year payment surges can indicate changes in practice volume, new services, or billing pattern shifts.
Average per-service amounts submitted by the provider compared to what Medicare actually paid — the gap represents the markup.
| Year | Avg Submitted | Avg Paid | Markup Ratio | Gap per Service | Total Payments | Services | Beneficiaries |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | $1.3K | $272.51 | 4.93x | $1.1K | $1.1M | 3.5K | 1.1K |
| 2015 | $1.2K | $243.23 | 5.12x | $1.0K | $2.0M | 6.1K | 2.0K |
| 2016 | $1.3K | $265.35 | 5.04x | $1.1K | $3.5M | 10.4K | 2.9K |
| 2017 | $1.3K | $262.78 | 5.10x | $1.1K | $4.4M | 13.0K | 2.8K |
| 2018 | $1.3K | $260.93 | 5.00x | $1.0K | $5.0M | 14.6K | 2.9K |
| 2019 | $1.4K | $270.27 | 5.00x | $1.1K | $3.3M | 9.6K | 2.7K |
| 2020 | $1.1K | $222.18 | 5.17x | $926.92 | $3.1M | 9.5K | 2.7K |
| 2021 | $1.6K | $307.85 | 5.07x | $1.3K | $3.2M | 8.7K | 2.0K |
| 2022 | $1.0K | $206.05 | 4.93x | $810.23 | $1.1M | 3.2K | 988 |
| 2023 | $1.2K | $227.14 | 5.24x | $964.16 | $1.4M | 3.8K | 862 |
| Code | Description | Services | Payments | Avg/Service | Markup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77523 | Proton treatment delivery, intermediate | 17.7K | $14.9M | $839.17 | 5.24x |
| 77525 | Proton treatment delivery, complex | 8.3K | $7.0M | $837.24 | 5.73x |
| 77301 | Management of modulation radiotherapy planning | 1.5K | $2.1M | $1.4K | 5.22x |
| G6002 | Stereoscopic x-ray guidance for localization of target volume for the delivery of radiation therapy | 25.4K | $1.4M | $55.11 | 5.06x |
| 77427 | Radiation treatment management, 5 treatments | 6.4K | $907.5K | $141.99 | 4.75x |
| 77336 | Radiation therapy consultation per week | 5.8K | $330.9K | $56.90 | 2.81x |
| 77332 | Radiation treatment devices, design and construction, simple | 4.4K | $196.2K | $44.91 | 6.57x |
| 77014 | CT scan guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields | 2.2K | $190.8K | $88.07 | 5.22x |
| 77290 | Management of radiation therapy, simulation, complex | 457 | $163.8K | $358.35 | 5.39x |
| 77334 | Radiation treatment devices, design and construction, complex | 1.6K | $161.6K | $99.98 | 5.55x |
| 77263 | Management of radiation therapy, complex | 1.0K | $128.6K | $126.04 | 4.80x |
| 99205 | New patient office or other outpatient visit, typically 60 minutes | 755 | $111.9K | $148.26 | 2.11x |
| 77300 | Calculation of radiation therapy dose | 2.0K | $95.7K | $48.98 | 5.10x |
| 77373 | Stereotactic body radiation therapy 1 or more lesions using imaging guidance | 107 | $92.9K | $868.64 | 5.24x |
| 99214 | Established patient office or other outpatient, visit typically 25 minutes | 1.0K | $78.3K | $75.98 | 2.06x |
| 99213 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit, typically 15 minutes | 1.4K | $68.6K | $50.53 | 2.64x |
| 77421 | X-ray guidance for radiation therapy delivery | 946 | $50.2K | $53.05 | 5.18x |
| 77293 | Respiratory motion management simulation | 122 | $40.1K | $328.94 | 4.38x |
| 77413 | Radiation treatment delivery, three or more treatment areas | 140 | $22.0K | $157.06 | 5.32x |
| 77338 | Design and construction of device for radiation therapy | 42 | $15.4K | $367.61 | 3.99x |
This provider submits charges 5.29 times higher than what Medicare actually pays.
A markup ratio of 5.29x means for every $100 Medicare pays, this provider initially charges $529. This is higher than the national average.
Always verify provider credentials and location before scheduling appointments. This data reflects Medicare payments and may not include all practice locations.
Share this provider's Medicare payment information
Last Updated: February 2026 (data through 2023, the latest CMS release)
Note: All data is from publicly available Medicare records. OpenMedicare is an independent journalism project not affiliated with CMS.
Believe this data is inaccurate? Dispute this data