OpenMedicare
Start Here
Explore
Fraud
Investigations
Data
Tools
About

Footer

OpenMedicare

Independent Medicare data journalism

Sister Sites

  • OpenMedicaid
  • OpenFeds
  • OpenSpending

Explore

  • Providers
  • Procedures
  • States
  • Specialties
  • Search

Fraud Analysis

  • Still Out There (AI)
  • Fraud Overview
  • Fraud Watchlist
  • Deep Dive Profiles
  • Impossible Numbers
  • Report Fraud

Investigations

  • The Algorithm Knows
  • How We Built the Model
  • Internal Medicine Crisis
  • Florida & California Fraud
  • Million Dollar Flagged
  • All Investigations

Tools

  • Provider Lookup
  • Compare
  • Cost Calculator
  • Your Medicare Dollar
  • Downloads

About

  • About OpenMedicare
  • Methodology
  • Glossary
  • Data Sources
  • API Docs
  • Updates
Data Sources: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data
Disclaimer: This site is an independent journalism project. Data analysis and editorial content are not affiliated with or endorsed by CMS or any government agency. All spending figures are based on publicly available Medicare payment records.
Sister Sites: OpenMedicaid ยท OpenFeds ยท OpenSpending

ยฉ 2026 OpenMedicare. Independent data journalism. Built by TheDataProject.ai

Methodologyโ€ขDownload Data
  1. Home
  2. Providers
  3. Frederic Yeganeh
๐Ÿ“ก
MDIndividual

Frederic Yeganeh, MD

NPI: 1710920582
Baltimore, MD
10 years of data
Diagnostic Radiology
$18.0M
Total Payments
46.9K
Beneficiaries
49.1K
Services
2.7x
Markup Ratio

Peer Comparison

99th
percentile in specialty
This provider$18.0M
Specialty median$115.6K

๐Ÿ“‹ Key Findings

1Billed $18.0M over 10 years
22.7x markup ratio (above median)
399th percentile in Diagnostic Radiology by payments
47 procedures with >3x markup
โœ“ No flags detected

๐Ÿ”Ž Data Analysis

This provider's $18.0M in total Medicare payments ranks in the 99th percentile of Diagnostic Radiology providers nationally.

Medicare payments to this provider grew 64% from 2014 to 2023.

71% of their billing comes from a single procedure code (78815 โ€” Nuclear medicine study with CT imaging skull base to mid-thigh).

AI-generated analysis based on Medicare payment data.

Annual Medicare Payments

Annual Services Provided

Avg Payment per Service

Markup Ratio Over Time

Submitted Charges vs. Medicare Payments

Average per-service amounts submitted by the provider compared to what Medicare actually paid โ€” the gap represents the markup.

YearAvg SubmittedAvg PaidMarkup RatioGap per ServiceTotal PaymentsServicesBeneficiaries
2014$420.02$157.512.67x$262.51$1.3M4.9K4.7K
2015$418.23$157.132.66x$261.10$1.2M4.8K4.6K
2016$526.62$226.222.33x$300.40$1.4M4.4K4.3K
2017$623.71$265.672.35x$358.04$1.8M5.3K5.0K
2018$717.26$266.552.69x$450.71$1.9M5.7K5.5K
2019$685.11$270.312.53x$414.80$2.0M5.9K5.7K
2020$621.07$225.272.76x$395.80$1.8M4.6K4.3K
2021$852.72$388.422.20x$464.30$2.1M4.9K4.6K
2022$648.02$239.782.70x$408.24$2.3M4.5K4.2K
2023$765.51$271.052.82x$494.46$2.2M4.2K4.0K

Top Procedures (20)

78815Nuclear medicine study with CT imaging skull base to mid-thigh
$12.4M
11.6K services$1.1K/svc2.50x markup
78816Nuclear medicine study with CT imaging whole body
$1.1M
948 services$1.2K/svc2.50x markup
A9552Fluorodeoxyglucose f-18 fdg, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 45 millicuriesโš  6.5x markup
$693.1K
9.3K services$74.26/svc6.55x markup
78306Bone and/or joint imaging, whole body
$627.6K
2.8K services$225.34/svc2.66x markup
78452Nuclear medicine study of vessels of heart using drugs or exercise multiple studiesโš  4.0x markup
$429.8K
6.9K services$62.07/svc4.02x markup
78315Bone and/or joint imaging, 3 phase study
$427.9K
1.5K services$282.05/svc2.47x markup
A9588Fluciclovine f-18, diagnostic, 1 millicurie
$242.0K
90 services$2.7K/svc1.40x markup
78227Imaging of liver and bile duct system with use of drugs
$241.9K
1.2K services$197.95/svc2.89x markup
A9595Piflufolastat f-18, diagnostic, 1 millicurie
$234.2K
321 services$729.66/svc1.40x markup
78264Stomach emptying study
$232.0K
891 services$260.38/svc2.44x markup
78582Nuclear medicine study of lung ventilation and blood circulation in the lungsโš  3.3x markup
$150.6K
1.6K services$96.49/svc3.25x markup
A9562Technetium tc-99m mertiatide, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 15 millicuriesโš  3.8x markup
$114.9K
431 services$266.62/svc3.84x markup
78226Imaging of liver and bile duct systemโš  3.0x markup
$113.0K
653 services$173.01/svc3.04x markup
A9503Technetium tc-99m medronate, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 30 millicuries
$90.4K
3.1K services$28.96/svc1.51x markup
78708Nuclear medicine study of kidney with assessment of blood flow and functionโš  3.4x markup
$82.7K
589 services$140.36/svc3.43x markup
78071Imaging of parathyroid with nuclear medicine studyโš  3.5x markup
$76.0K
252 services$301.62/svc3.55x markup
A9586Florbetapir f18, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 10 millicuries
$73.2K
34 services$2.2K/svc1.35x markup
78814Nuclear medicine study with CT imaging
$71.8K
92 services$780.21/svc2.67x markup
78014Nuclear medicine imaging for thyroid uptake measurements
$69.8K
342 services$204.00/svc2.84x markup
78608Nuclear medicine study brain with metabolic evaluation
$61.7K
52 services$1.2K/svc2.52x markup
Show detailed table โ–พ
CodeDescriptionServicesPaymentsAvg/ServiceMarkup
78815Nuclear medicine study with CT imaging skull base to mid-thigh11.6K$12.4M$1.1K2.50x
78816Nuclear medicine study with CT imaging whole body948$1.1M$1.2K2.50x
A9552Fluorodeoxyglucose f-18 fdg, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 45 millicuries9.3K$693.1K$74.266.55x
78306Bone and/or joint imaging, whole body2.8K$627.6K$225.342.66x
78452Nuclear medicine study of vessels of heart using drugs or exercise multiple studies6.9K$429.8K$62.074.02x
78315Bone and/or joint imaging, 3 phase study1.5K$427.9K$282.052.47x
A9588Fluciclovine f-18, diagnostic, 1 millicurie90$242.0K$2.7K1.40x
78227Imaging of liver and bile duct system with use of drugs1.2K$241.9K$197.952.89x
A9595Piflufolastat f-18, diagnostic, 1 millicurie321$234.2K$729.661.40x
78264Stomach emptying study891$232.0K$260.382.44x
78582Nuclear medicine study of lung ventilation and blood circulation in the lungs1.6K$150.6K$96.493.25x
A9562Technetium tc-99m mertiatide, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 15 millicuries431$114.9K$266.623.84x
78226Imaging of liver and bile duct system653$113.0K$173.013.04x
A9503Technetium tc-99m medronate, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 30 millicuries3.1K$90.4K$28.961.51x
78708Nuclear medicine study of kidney with assessment of blood flow and function589$82.7K$140.363.43x
78071Imaging of parathyroid with nuclear medicine study252$76.0K$301.623.55x
A9586Florbetapir f18, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 10 millicuries34$73.2K$2.2K1.35x
78814Nuclear medicine study with CT imaging92$71.8K$780.212.67x
78014Nuclear medicine imaging for thyroid uptake measurements342$69.8K$204.002.84x
78608Nuclear medicine study brain with metabolic evaluation52$61.7K$1.2K2.52x

Markup Analysis

Charge-to-Payment Ratio

2.7x

This provider submits charges 2.7 times higher than what Medicare actually pays.

What This Means

A markup ratio of 2.7x means for every $100 Medicare pays, this provider initially charges $270. This is higher than the national average.

Location

Baltimore, MD

Provider Verification

Always verify provider credentials and location before scheduling appointments. This data reflects Medicare payments and may not include all practice locations.

Related

Browse
โ† Back to Provider Directory
State
All providers in MD โ†’
Specialty
All Diagnostic Radiology providers โ†’
Tool
Compare this provider โ†’
Analysis
Fraud Watchlist โ†’
Search
Search all providers โ†’

Share This Provider

Share this provider's Medicare payment information

Share:

Data Sources

  • โ€ข Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
  • โ€ข Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data (2014-2023)
  • โ€ข National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES)

Last Updated: February 2026 (data through 2023, the latest CMS release)

Note: All data is from publicly available Medicare records. OpenMedicare is an independent journalism project not affiliated with CMS.

Believe this data is inaccurate? Dispute this data