OpenMedicare
Start Here
Explore
Fraud
Investigations
Data
Tools
About

Footer

OpenMedicare

Independent Medicare data journalism

Sister Sites

  • OpenMedicaid
  • OpenFeds
  • OpenSpending

Explore

  • Providers
  • Procedures
  • States
  • Specialties
  • Search

Fraud Analysis

  • Still Out There (AI)
  • Fraud Overview
  • Fraud Watchlist
  • Deep Dive Profiles
  • Impossible Numbers
  • Report Fraud

Investigations

  • The Algorithm Knows
  • How We Built the Model
  • Internal Medicine Crisis
  • Florida & California Fraud
  • Million Dollar Flagged
  • All Investigations

Tools

  • Provider Lookup
  • Compare
  • Cost Calculator
  • Your Medicare Dollar
  • Downloads

About

  • About OpenMedicare
  • Methodology
  • Glossary
  • Data Sources
  • API Docs
  • Updates
Data Sources: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data
Disclaimer: This site is an independent journalism project. Data analysis and editorial content are not affiliated with or endorsed by CMS or any government agency. All spending figures are based on publicly available Medicare payment records.
Sister Sites: OpenMedicaid ยท OpenFeds ยท OpenSpending

ยฉ 2026 OpenMedicare. Independent data journalism. Built by TheDataProject.ai

Methodologyโ€ขDownload Data
  1. Home
  2. Providers
  3. Frederick Prall
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ
MDIndividual

Frederick Prall, M.D.

NPI: 1740375534
Carmel, IN
10 years of data
Ophthalmology
$22.7M
Total Payments
229
Beneficiaries
120.5K
Services
3.09x
Markup Ratio

Peer Comparison

99th
percentile in specialty
This provider$22.7M
Specialty median$383.7K

๐Ÿ“‹ Key Findings

1Billed $22.7M over 10 years
23.09x markup ratio (above median)
399th percentile in Ophthalmology by payments
4Payments surged 78% in 2016
59 procedures with >3x markup
โœ“ No flags detected

๐Ÿ”Ž Data Analysis

This provider's $22.7M in total Medicare payments ranks in the 99th percentile of Ophthalmology providers nationally.

Medicare payments to this provider grew 287% from 2014 to 2023.

71% of their billing comes from a single procedure code (J0178 โ€” Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg).

AI-generated analysis based on Medicare payment data.

Annual Medicare Payments

Annual Services Provided

Avg Payment per Service

Markup Ratio Over Time

๐Ÿ“ˆ

Notable: Payments increased 78% in 2016

Year-over-year payment surges can indicate changes in practice volume, new services, or billing pattern shifts.

Submitted Charges vs. Medicare Payments

Average per-service amounts submitted by the provider compared to what Medicare actually paid โ€” the gap represents the markup.

YearAvg SubmittedAvg PaidMarkup RatioGap per ServiceTotal PaymentsServicesBeneficiaries
2014$327.29$137.442.38x$189.85$851.3K6.2K32
2015$487.30$169.322.88x$317.98$1.0M6.0K28
2016$640.40$173.823.68x$466.58$1.8M10.3K25
2017$639.54$164.523.89x$475.02$2.1M12.7K25
2018$633.84$172.423.68x$461.42$2.3M13.1K20
2019$687.96$204.103.37x$483.86$2.7M13.3K20
2020$611.96$228.842.67x$383.12$2.8M12.4K20
2021$635.03$233.782.72x$401.25$2.9M12.3K19
2022$610.54$226.362.70x$384.18$3.0M13.3K18
2023$454.93$156.962.90x$297.97$3.3M21.0K22

Top Procedures (20)

J0178Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg
$15.8M
21.6K services$730.79/svc2.03x markup
67028Injection of drug into eyeโš  14.4x markup
$1.5M
19.2K services$75.79/svc14.44x markup
92134Imaging of retinaโš  5.2x markup
$806.3K
28.4K services$28.35/svc5.22x markup
J2778Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg
$717.2K
2.4K services$298.94/svc1.88x markup
99214Established patient office or other outpatient visit, 30-39 minutes
$410.1K
5.7K services$72.38/svc2.50x markup
J7312Injection, dexamethasone, intravitreal implant, 0.1 mg
$303.3K
1.9K services$156.99/svc1.91x markup
J3590Unclassified biologics
$286.1K
6.2K services$46.50/svc1.50x markup
J2777Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg
$258.5K
9.0K services$28.73/svc1.39x markup
67228Destruction of leaking blood vessels of retina using laserโš  4.9x markup
$256.2K
762 services$336.26/svc4.90x markup
92235Exam of retinal blood vessels using a special camera after injection of a dyeโš  3.4x markup
$246.2K
2.8K services$88.54/svc3.38x markup
J0179Injection, brolucizumab-dbll, 1 mg
$208.6K
834 services$250.06/svc1.52x markup
99204New patient office or other outpatient visit, 45-59 minutes
$203.0K
1.9K services$109.62/svc2.07x markup
Q5128Injection, ranibizumab-eqrn (cimerli), biosimilar, 0.1 mgโš  3.1x markup
$185.9K
828 services$224.51/svc3.10x markup
99213Established patient office or other outpatient visit, 20-29 minutes
$185.6K
3.6K services$50.95/svc2.65x markup
J3490Unclassified drugs
$163.3K
97 services$1.7K/svc2.13x markup
67041Removal of membrane from the retinaโš  4.7x markup
$150.5K
173 services$869.66/svc4.70x markup
67210Destruction of growth of retina using a laserโš  4.0x markup
$147.4K
390 services$377.89/svc3.95x markup
92226Examination of eye by ophthalmoscope with retinal drawingโš  3.9x markup
$138.8K
4.2K services$33.25/svc3.91x markup
Q5124Injection, ranibizumab-nuna, biosimilar, (byooviz), 0.1 mg
$126.3K
755 services$167.31/svc2.14x markup
67145Photocoagulation treatment to prevent detachment of retinaโš  3.4x markup
$74.9K
214 services$350.09/svc3.43x markup
Show detailed table โ–พ
CodeDescriptionServicesPaymentsAvg/ServiceMarkup
J0178Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg21.6K$15.8M$730.792.03x
67028Injection of drug into eye19.2K$1.5M$75.7914.44x
92134Imaging of retina28.4K$806.3K$28.355.22x
J2778Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg2.4K$717.2K$298.941.88x
99214Established patient office or other outpatient visit, 30-39 minutes5.7K$410.1K$72.382.50x
J7312Injection, dexamethasone, intravitreal implant, 0.1 mg1.9K$303.3K$156.991.91x
J3590Unclassified biologics6.2K$286.1K$46.501.50x
J2777Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg9.0K$258.5K$28.731.39x
67228Destruction of leaking blood vessels of retina using laser762$256.2K$336.264.90x
92235Exam of retinal blood vessels using a special camera after injection of a dye2.8K$246.2K$88.543.38x
J0179Injection, brolucizumab-dbll, 1 mg834$208.6K$250.061.52x
99204New patient office or other outpatient visit, 45-59 minutes1.9K$203.0K$109.622.07x
Q5128Injection, ranibizumab-eqrn (cimerli), biosimilar, 0.1 mg828$185.9K$224.513.10x
99213Established patient office or other outpatient visit, 20-29 minutes3.6K$185.6K$50.952.65x
J3490Unclassified drugs97$163.3K$1.7K2.13x
67041Removal of membrane from the retina173$150.5K$869.664.70x
67210Destruction of growth of retina using a laser390$147.4K$377.893.95x
92226Examination of eye by ophthalmoscope with retinal drawing4.2K$138.8K$33.253.91x
Q5124Injection, ranibizumab-nuna, biosimilar, (byooviz), 0.1 mg755$126.3K$167.312.14x
67145Photocoagulation treatment to prevent detachment of retina214$74.9K$350.093.43x

Markup Analysis

Charge-to-Payment Ratio

3.09x

This provider submits charges 3.09 times higher than what Medicare actually pays.

What This Means

A markup ratio of 3.09x means for every $100 Medicare pays, this provider initially charges $309. This is higher than the national average.

Location

Carmel, IN

Provider Verification

Always verify provider credentials and location before scheduling appointments. This data reflects Medicare payments and may not include all practice locations.

Similar Providers

Other Ophthalmology providers in IN for peer comparison.

Frederick Prall (you)
$22.7M
Drew Sommerville, MD
$35.4M
Show detailed table โ–พ
ProviderLocationTotal PaymentsStatus
Drew Sommerville, MDEvansville, IN$35.4Mโœ“ Clear

Related

Browse
โ† Back to Provider Directory
State
All providers in IN โ†’
Specialty
All Ophthalmology providers โ†’
Tool
Compare this provider โ†’
Analysis
Fraud Watchlist โ†’
Search
Search all providers โ†’

Share This Provider

Share this provider's Medicare payment information

Share:

Data Sources

  • โ€ข Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
  • โ€ข Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data (2014-2023)
  • โ€ข National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES)

Last Updated: February 2026 (data through 2023, the latest CMS release)

Note: All data is from publicly available Medicare records. OpenMedicare is an independent journalism project not affiliated with CMS.

Believe this data is inaccurate? Dispute this data