This provider's $9.7M in total Medicare payments ranks in the 98th percentile of Radiation Oncology providers nationally.
This provider's billing patterns fall within normal ranges for their specialty.
AI-generated analysis based on Medicare payment data.
Average per-service amounts submitted by the provider compared to what Medicare actually paid — the gap represents the markup.
| Year | Avg Submitted | Avg Paid | Markup Ratio | Gap per Service | Total Payments | Services | Beneficiaries |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | $1.1K | $275.33 | 4.05x | $839.52 | $1.7M | 6.5K | 2.7K |
| 2018 | $974.06 | $233.13 | 4.18x | $740.93 | $1.9M | 7.4K | 3.1K |
| 2019 | $1.1K | $254.03 | 4.25x | $826.11 | $1.7M | 6.5K | 2.8K |
| 2020 | $948.49 | $235.52 | 4.03x | $712.97 | $1.2M | 5.6K | 1.8K |
| 2021 | $969.83 | $250.57 | 3.87x | $719.26 | $1.0M | 5.8K | 1.6K |
| 2022 | $1.4K | $268.66 | 5.39x | $1.2K | $919.7K | 5.0K | 1.5K |
| 2023 | $1.7K | $323.30 | 5.28x | $1.4K | $1.3M | 5.6K | 1.6K |
| Code | Description | Services | Payments | Avg/Service | Markup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77523 | Proton treatment delivery, intermediate | 4.2K | $3.4M | $815.13 | 5.24x |
| 78815 | Nuclear medicine study with CT imaging skull base to mid-thigh | 898 | $1.0M | $1.1K | 4.08x |
| G6015 | Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session | 3.0K | $801.5K | $271.52 | 4.58x |
| G6002 | Stereoscopic x-ray guidance for localization of target volume for the delivery of radiation therapy | 9.3K | $535.0K | $57.76 | 4.32x |
| 77014 | CT scan guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields | 5.7K | $523.7K | $91.56 | 4.39x |
| 77522 | Proton treatment delivery, simple with compensation | 662 | $513.7K | $775.97 | 5.12x |
| 77427 | Radiation treatment management, 5 treatments | 2.5K | $373.3K | $151.01 | 4.07x |
| A9552 | Fluorodeoxyglucose f-18 fdg, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 45 millicuries | 886 | $342.0K | $386.04 | 2.88x |
| 77290 | Management of radiation therapy, simulation, complex | 712 | $273.9K | $384.70 | 3.92x |
| G6012 | Radiation treatment delivery,3 or more separate treatment areas, custom blocking, tangential ports, wedges, rotational beam, compensators, electron beam; 6-10 mev | 1.3K | $260.7K | $198.55 | 3.47x |
| 99213 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit, typically 15 minutes | 3.7K | $213.3K | $57.76 | 3.21x |
| 77301 | Management of modulation radiotherapy planning | 127 | $187.0K | $1.5K | 4.21x |
| 77373 | Stereotactic body radiation therapy 1 or more lesions using imaging guidance | 158 | $158.5K | $1.0K | 3.61x |
| 77336 | Radiation therapy consultation per week | 2.1K | $129.6K | $62.28 | 3.58x |
| 77280 | Management of radiation therapy simulation, simple | 543 | $113.7K | $209.46 | 3.02x |
| 77295 | Management of radiation therapy, 3D | 270 | $101.9K | $377.34 | 4.09x |
| 77525 | Proton treatment delivery, complex | 111 | $100.9K | $909.33 | 4.88x |
| 77334 | Radiation treatment devices, design and construction, complex | 796 | $78.6K | $98.78 | 4.86x |
| 77338 | Design and construction of device for radiation therapy | 181 | $68.6K | $379.15 | 4.02x |
| 71250 | CT scan chest | 517 | $56.8K | $109.84 | 6.01x |
This provider submits charges 4.57 times higher than what Medicare actually pays.
A markup ratio of 4.57x means for every $100 Medicare pays, this provider initially charges $457. This is higher than the national average.
Always verify provider credentials and location before scheduling appointments. This data reflects Medicare payments and may not include all practice locations.
Other Radiation Oncology providers in FL for peer comparison.
| Provider | Location | Total Payments | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timothy Kerwin, MD | Naples, FL | $42.2M | ✓ Clear |
| Scot Ackerman, MD | Jacksonville, FL | $37.7M | ✓ Clear |
| Constantine Mantz, MD | Cape Coral, FL | $33.8M | ✓ Clear |
Share this provider's Medicare payment information
Last Updated: February 2026 (data through 2023, the latest CMS release)
Note: All data is from publicly available Medicare records. OpenMedicare is an independent journalism project not affiliated with CMS.
Believe this data is inaccurate? Dispute this data