This provider's $6.1M in total Medicare payments ranks in the 99th percentile of Diagnostic Radiology providers nationally.
This provider's billing patterns fall within normal ranges for their specialty.
AI-generated analysis based on Medicare payment data.
Notable: Payments increased 60% in 2021
Year-over-year payment surges can indicate changes in practice volume, new services, or billing pattern shifts.
Average per-service amounts submitted by the provider compared to what Medicare actually paid — the gap represents the markup.
| Year | Avg Submitted | Avg Paid | Markup Ratio | Gap per Service | Total Payments | Services | Beneficiaries |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | $675.22 | $127.89 | 5.28x | $547.33 | $911.9K | 10.7K | 10.3K |
| 2015 | $522.83 | $99.44 | 5.26x | $423.39 | $583.1K | 9.5K | 9.3K |
| 2016 | $334.52 | $60.83 | 5.50x | $273.69 | $539.6K | 9.3K | 9.0K |
| 2017 | $297.03 | $56.87 | 5.22x | $240.16 | $522.1K | 8.4K | 8.2K |
| 2018 | $323.83 | $58.80 | 5.51x | $265.03 | $592.0K | 9.1K | 8.9K |
| 2019 | $359.14 | $70.73 | 5.08x | $288.41 | $613.1K | 9.1K | 8.8K |
| 2020 | $320.08 | $63.34 | 5.05x | $256.74 | $378.6K | 5.8K | 5.6K |
| 2021 | $506.58 | $93.87 | 5.40x | $412.71 | $606.7K | 8.1K | 7.9K |
| 2022 | $586.75 | $98.55 | 5.95x | $488.20 | $693.9K | 8.7K | 8.4K |
| 2023 | $510.75 | $96.91 | 5.27x | $413.84 | $645.2K | 7.5K | 7.2K |
| Code | Description | Services | Payments | Avg/Service | Markup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77067 | Mammography of both breasts | 6.8K | $1.0M | $151.18 | 2.94x |
| 76700 | Ultrasound of abdomen | 8.5K | $766.4K | $89.94 | 4.84x |
| G0202 | Screening mammography, producing direct digital image, bilateral, all views | 4.9K | $749.1K | $152.84 | 3.03x |
| 77080 | Bone density measurement using dedicated X-ray machine | 9.5K | $441.5K | $46.49 | 7.85x |
| 71046 | X-ray of chest, 2 views | 8.4K | $196.3K | $23.34 | 5.91x |
| 76536 | Ultrasound of head and neck | 2.1K | $181.1K | $87.42 | 4.97x |
| 93880 | Ultrasound scanning of blood flow (outside the brain) on both sides of head and neck | 1.1K | $180.3K | $164.52 | 3.87x |
| 76770 | Ultrasound behind abdominal cavity | 2.1K | $172.7K | $82.83 | 5.31x |
| 76641 | Ultrasound of one breast | 2.0K | $168.3K | $82.19 | 5.36x |
| 72110 | X-ray of lower and sacral spine, minimum of 4 views | 3.9K | $141.1K | $36.17 | 4.18x |
| 74178 | CT scan of abdomen and pelvis before and after contrast | 423 | $139.8K | $330.61 | 5.05x |
| 93970 | Ultrasound scan of veins of both arms or legs including assessment of compression and functional maneuvers | 831 | $132.7K | $159.71 | 4.00x |
| 71020 | X-ray of chest, 2 views, front and side | 7.0K | $129.5K | $18.44 | 6.72x |
| 72148 | MRI scan of lower spinal canal | 529 | $101.0K | $190.95 | 8.35x |
| 77078 | Ct scan for measuring calcium and other minerals in bone | 886 | $99.8K | $112.62 | 2.29x |
| 76377 | 3D radiographic procedure with computerized image postprocessing | 1.4K | $95.6K | $68.52 | 11.36x |
| 73562 | X-ray of knee, 3 views | 3.4K | $93.0K | $27.15 | 4.82x |
| 76856 | Ultrasound of pelvis | 1.2K | $91.9K | $79.53 | 5.61x |
| 71250 | CT scan chest | 673 | $75.9K | $112.85 | 6.91x |
| 73721 | MRI scan of leg joint | 310 | $62.9K | $203.06 | 7.87x |
This provider submits charges 4.87 times higher than what Medicare actually pays.
A markup ratio of 4.87x means for every $100 Medicare pays, this provider initially charges $487. This is higher than the national average.
Always verify provider credentials and location before scheduling appointments. This data reflects Medicare payments and may not include all practice locations.
Other Diagnostic Radiology providers in CA for peer comparison.
| Provider | Location | Total Payments | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen Liu, M.D. | Modesto, CA | $37.2M | ✓ Clear |
Share this provider's Medicare payment information
Last Updated: February 2026 (data through 2023, the latest CMS release)
Note: All data is from publicly available Medicare records. OpenMedicare is an independent journalism project not affiliated with CMS.
Believe this data is inaccurate? Dispute this data