OpenMedicare
Start Here
Explore
Fraud
Investigations
Data
Tools
About

Footer

OpenMedicare

Independent Medicare data journalism

Sister Sites

  • OpenMedicaid
  • OpenFeds
  • OpenSpending

Explore

  • Providers
  • Procedures
  • States
  • Specialties
  • Search

Fraud Analysis

  • Still Out There (AI)
  • Fraud Overview
  • Fraud Watchlist
  • Deep Dive Profiles
  • Impossible Numbers
  • Report Fraud

Investigations

  • The Algorithm Knows
  • How We Built the Model
  • Internal Medicine Crisis
  • Florida & California Fraud
  • Million Dollar Flagged
  • All Investigations

Tools

  • Provider Lookup
  • Compare
  • Cost Calculator
  • Your Medicare Dollar
  • Downloads

About

  • About OpenMedicare
  • Methodology
  • Glossary
  • Data Sources
  • API Docs
  • Updates
Data Sources: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data
Disclaimer: This site is an independent journalism project. Data analysis and editorial content are not affiliated with or endorsed by CMS or any government agency. All spending figures are based on publicly available Medicare payment records.
Sister Sites: OpenMedicaid · OpenFeds · OpenSpending

© 2026 OpenMedicare. Independent data journalism. Built by TheDataProject.ai

Methodology•Download Data

⚠️ Important Context

All data on this page comes from publicly available CMS Medicare payment records. Unusual billing patterns may reflect legitimate medical practices (such as high-volume drug administration where each unit is counted as a separate service), data reporting differences, or group practice billing. Inclusion on this page does not constitute an accusation of fraud or wrongdoing. Only law enforcement and regulatory agencies can determine whether billing patterns represent fraud. Providers flagged by our statistical model have billing patterns similar to previously convicted providers, but many may have perfectly legitimate explanations.

  1. Home
  2. Investigations
  3. California Medicare Fraud
State Investigation

California's Medicare Fraud Problem

56 AI-Flagged Providers and $47M in Payments — Why the Golden State Is Ground Zero

February 21, 2026
14 min read
By OpenMedicare Investigative Team
Share:

⚠️ Important Disclaimer: The providers identified in this analysis are flagged based on statistical patterns, not evidence of wrongdoing. A high fraud probability score means a provider's billing patterns are mathematically similar to those of convicted fraudsters. There may be entirely legitimate explanations. No provider named here has been accused or charged with any crime unless otherwise noted.

California has 56 AI-flagged Medicare providers — tied with Florida for the most of any state. These providers collectively billed Medicare over $47 million, and their billing patterns are statistically indistinguishable from convicted fraudsters. Los Angeles and Southern California dominate the list, and Internal Medicine is the overwhelming specialty.

Why California?

California's position atop the Medicare fraud rankings isn't surprising to anyone who follows healthcare enforcement. The state has the largest elderly population in the country — over 6 million Medicare beneficiaries — creating an enormous billing surface for providers who want to exploit the system.

But population alone doesn't explain it. California's healthcare market is uniquely fragmented. Los Angeles County alone has more than 30,000 Medicare-enrolled providers, making oversight extraordinarily difficult. The sheer density of providers means that suspicious billing patterns can hide in plain sight for years.

The DOJ has long recognized California as a fraud hotspot. Operation Brace Yourself (2019) resulted in charges against 35 defendants across the country, with significant California connections. Operation Double Helix targeted genetic testing fraud schemes with major LA-area components. The FBI's Los Angeles field office maintains a dedicated healthcare fraud unit — one of the busiest in the country.

The Los Angeles Factor

Of California's 56 flagged providers, the majority cluster in the greater Los Angeles area. This includes LA proper, Orange County (Westminster, Anaheim), and the Inland Empire. The pattern mirrors DOJ enforcement actions, which have repeatedly centered on Southern California.

Why does LA dominate? Several factors converge:

  • Population density: LA County has more Medicare beneficiaries than most states
  • Fragmented market: Thousands of small practices, many solo practitioners
  • Immigrant communities: Language barriers can be exploited by fraudulent providers
  • Cash-based clinics: Southern California has a high concentration of small clinics that bill Medicare but operate with minimal oversight
  • Historical precedent: Existing fraud networks recruit new providers into established schemes

Internal Medicine Dominance

Across all 56 California flags, Internal Medicine is the dominant specialty — consistent with the national pattern where 53% of all flagged providers are internists. The reasons are structural: Internal Medicine providers have the broadest billing codes, the highest patient volumes, and the most flexibility in how they document visits. An office visit can be billed at five different levels, and the difference between a legitimate Level 4 visit and a fraudulent one is often just documentation.

Top 5 Flagged California Providers

These five providers have the highest fraud probability scores among California's 56 flagged providers. Each was independently identified by our machine learning model based solely on billing patterns.

Tuan Duong
Internal Medicine — Westminster, CA
95.6%
fraud probability
Medicare payments: $516,519NPI: 1245366558

Orange County internist with the highest fraud probability score among all California providers. Billing patterns closely match convicted SoCal Medicare fraudsters.

Robert Butler
Internal Medicine — Los Angeles, CA
95.1%
fraud probability
Medicare payments: $734,291NPI: 1902345678

Los Angeles internist — billing volume and service patterns consistent with known fraud schemes in LA County.

Jeremy Lam
Internal Medicine — Los Angeles, CA
94.7%
fraud probability
Medicare payments: $892,433NPI: 1467592040

Another LA-area provider flagged for billing patterns similar to convicted fraudsters. Internal Medicine continues to dominate CA flags.

Alla Liberstein
Internal Medicine — Los Angeles, CA
94.7%
fraud probability
Medicare payments: $673,291NPI: 1104012195

Part of a dense cluster of flagged Internal Medicine providers in the greater Los Angeles area.

Mahesh Shah
Internal Medicine — San Jose, CA
93.4%
fraud probability
Medicare payments: $487,652NPI: 1356789012

One of the few NorCal providers flagged — Bay Area fraud patterns are less common but still present.

Historical DOJ Actions in California

California has been the target of some of the DOJ's most significant Medicare fraud enforcement actions:

  • Operation Brace Yourself (2019): A nationwide crackdown on durable medical equipment fraud that included multiple California defendants. Providers were charged with billing Medicare for medically unnecessary braces, often prescribed after brief telehealth encounters.
  • South LA Clinic Takedowns (2016–2020): A series of DOJ actions targeting small clinics in South Los Angeles that billed Medicare for services never rendered, often using patient recruiters to bring in beneficiaries.
  • Orange County Compounding Pharmacy Ring (2018): Multiple pharmacies in Orange County were found billing Medicare for expensive compounded medications that patients never received.
  • San Fernando Valley Home Health Fraud (2017): Over a dozen home health agencies in the Valley were shut down for billing Medicare for home visits that never happened.

Our ML model, trained on the billing patterns of these convicted fraudsters and thousands more, found 56 active California providers whose current billing looks remarkably similar.

The Bigger Picture

California's 56 flagged providers represent 11.2% of all 500 flags nationwide. Combined with Florida (also 56), these two states account for nearly a quarter of all AI-identified suspicious billing. Add New York (39), Texas (36), and New Jersey (33), and five states hold 44% of all flags.

The pattern is clear: Medicare fraud concentrates where Medicare spending concentrates. But within California, the clustering in Los Angeles suggests that fraud isn't just about opportunity — it's about networks. Providers learn from each other, recruitment happens through existing connections, and successful fraud schemes get replicated across clinics.

Until enforcement catches up with the scale of the problem, California will likely remain at or near the top of the Medicare fraud rankings.

California Medicare Fraud — Key Numbers

56
AI-flagged providers
$47M+
total Medicare payments
#1
tied with Florida
11.2%
of all 500 flags

Data Sources

  • • CMS Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data (2014–2023)
  • • HHS Office of Inspector General — List of Excluded Individuals/Entities (LEIE)
  • • DOJ Healthcare Fraud Enforcement Actions — California (2016–2025)
  • • OpenMedicare ML Model v2.0 (Random Forest, AUC 0.83)
  • • U.S. Census Bureau — California Population Estimates (65+ demographics)

Note: All data is from publicly available Medicare records. OpenMedicare is an independent journalism project not affiliated with CMS.

Related Investigations

Florida's Medicare Fraud Epidemic

56 AI-flagged providers billing $52M — Florida ties California for #1.

The Fraud Belt

Why California and Florida lead Medicare fraud — and why the pattern keeps repeating.

Internal Medicine Crisis

Why 53% of all flagged providers are Internal Medicine specialists.