Cost analysis for CPT G6015 — Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session
Average Medicare Payment
N/A
Total Payments (Latest)
N/A
Services (Latest)
N/A
Price Change (–)
N/A
The most expensive state pays 1.4x more than the cheapest for this procedure. CA averages $333.69 vs AR at $243.89.
| State | Avg Payment | Total Payments | Services | Providers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | $333.69 | $37.5M | 112.2K | 153 |
| NJ | $324.03 | $10.7M | 32.9K | 28 |
| NY | $322.87 | $19.5M | 60.4K | 92 |
| HI | $316.44 | $1.3M | 4.2K | 8 |
| CT | $315.19 | $991.6K | 3.1K | 2 |
| MD | $311.55 | $8.7M | 27.9K | 38 |
| AK | $306.88 | $1.7M | 5.4K | 8 |
| DE | $301.91 | $182.1K | 603 | 4 |
| MA | $300.00 | $2.8M | 9.3K | 10 |
| CO | $298.04 | $3.3M | 11.0K | 14 |
| NH | $296.23 | $513.4K | 1.7K | 1 |
| GU | $293.56 | $141.5K | 482 | 1 |
| RI | $292.91 | $1.4M | 4.7K | 11 |
| ND | $292.20 | $1.2M | 4.2K | 3 |
| WY | $291.84 | $495.8K | 1.7K | 3 |
| VA | $291.52 | $4.5M | 15.3K | 17 |
| MN | $290.72 | $4.7M | 16.1K | 34 |
| WA | $290.24 | $6.3M | 21.8K | 31 |
| UT | $287.67 | $1.5M | 5.2K | 9 |
| OR | $287.48 | $1.8M | 6.4K | 13 |
| PR | $286.70 | $223.3K | 779 | 2 |
| IL | $285.30 | $7.8M | 27.4K | 30 |
| NV | $284.67 | $4.8M | 16.7K | 20 |
| PA | $281.90 | $6.3M | 22.5K | 44 |
| TX | $277.69 | $37.1M | 133.5K | 236 |
| FL | $275.79 | $51.4M | 186.3K | 179 |
| AZ | $275.49 | $15.9M | 57.7K | 62 |
| WI | $273.55 | $1.3M | 4.8K | 16 |
| MT | $272.61 | $319.8K | 1.2K | 1 |
| OH | $267.41 | $6.7M | 25.1K | 47 |
| DC | $267.26 | $751.0K | 2.8K | 3 |
| NC | $265.42 | $5.5M | 20.8K | 37 |
| KS | $265.42 | $5.3M | 20.1K | 9 |
| MI | $265.07 | $5.9M | 22.1K | 26 |
| NE | $265.00 | $1.6M | 6.2K | 8 |
| IN | $264.44 | $5.6M | 21.3K | 17 |
| SC | $264.34 | $6.1M | 23.2K | 13 |
| MO | $263.42 | $2.2M | 8.5K | 7 |
| NM | $261.76 | $345.8K | 1.3K | 7 |
| IA | $259.60 | $491.4K | 1.9K | 9 |
| KY | $258.66 | $2.5M | 9.7K | 16 |
| TN | $258.65 | $3.8M | 14.5K | 22 |
| GA | $257.11 | $5.5M | 21.6K | 30 |
| ID | $255.89 | $1.7M | 6.8K | 18 |
| AL | $253.26 | $6.6M | 26.1K | 37 |
| ME | $252.59 | $317.5K | 1.3K | 1 |
| LA | $250.99 | $5.1M | 20.4K | 21 |
| OK | $250.16 | $1.7M | 6.8K | 12 |
| MS | $247.51 | $898.5K | 3.6K | 3 |
| WV | $247.47 | $1.3M | 5.4K | 4 |
| AR | $243.89 | $4.3M | 17.6K | 12 |
| Provider | Specialty | State | Payments | Services | Avg/Service |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central Arkansas Radiation Therapy Institute Inc | Radiation Therapy Center | AR | $2.2M | 9.2K | $240.68 |
| Parthiv Mehta | Radiation Oncology | IL | $1.7M | 5.8K | $300.66 |
| Sonal Sura | Radiation Oncology | FL | $1.6M | 5.6K | $285.54 |
| James Russo | Radiation Oncology | LA | $1.5M | 6.2K | $250.32 |
| Nicolas Zouain | Radiation Oncology | FL | $1.5M | 5.5K | $273.54 |
| Glen Gejerman | Radiation Oncology | NJ | $1.4M | 4.3K | $321.72 |
| David Kornguth | Radiation Oncology | CA | $1.4M | 3.5K | $390.19 |
| Timothy Kerwin | Radiation Oncology | FL | $1.4M | 4.8K | $286.48 |
| Mark Thompson | Radiation Oncology | KS | $1.4M | 5.0K | $275.33 |
| Michael Chancellor | Radiation Oncology | FL | $1.3M | 4.9K | $272.60 |
| Kenon Qamar | Radiation Oncology | KS | $1.3M | 5.0K | $263.16 |
| John Sylvester | Radiation Oncology | FL | $1.3M | 4.7K | $273.58 |
| Wilson Hernandez | Radiation Oncology | TX | $1.3M | 4.2K | $296.63 |
| Jack Wang | Radiation Oncology | MI | $1.2M | 5.3K | $236.14 |
| Hemangini Shah | Radiation Oncology | NJ | $1.2M | 3.8K | $321.80 |
| Eduard Kagan | Radiation Oncology | NY | $1.2M | 3.4K | $350.67 |
| Matthew Allen | Radiation Oncology | CA | $1.2M | 3.8K | $306.50 |
| Rizwan Nurani | Radiation Oncology | CA | $1.2M | 3.1K | $380.17 |
| Richard Garza | Radiation Oncology | TX | $1.2M | 3.8K | $305.34 |
| Eric Sutphen | Radiation Oncology | MO | $1.1M | 4.2K | $270.14 |
Based on the data, CPT G6015 shows a 1.4x variation in pricing across states — relatively consistent by Medicare standards.
Medicare's fee schedule attempts to standardize pricing, though some variation is expected due to geographic cost-of-living adjustments and practice expense differences.
This analysis is based on publicly available CMS data and does not account for patient complexity, comorbidities, or facility-specific factors that may justify pricing differences.
Note: All data is from publicly available Medicare records. OpenMedicare is an independent journalism project not affiliated with CMS.