OpenMedicare
Start Here
Explore
Fraud
Investigations
Data
Tools
About

Footer

OpenMedicare

Independent Medicare data journalism

Sister Sites

  • OpenMedicaid
  • OpenFeds
  • OpenSpending

Explore

  • Providers
  • Procedures
  • States
  • Specialties
  • Search

Fraud Analysis

  • Still Out There (AI)
  • Fraud Overview
  • Fraud Watchlist
  • Deep Dive Profiles
  • Impossible Numbers
  • Report Fraud

Investigations

  • The Algorithm Knows
  • How We Built the Model
  • Internal Medicine Crisis
  • Florida & California Fraud
  • Million Dollar Flagged
  • All Investigations

Tools

  • Provider Lookup
  • Compare
  • Cost Calculator
  • Your Medicare Dollar
  • Downloads

About

  • About OpenMedicare
  • Methodology
  • Glossary
  • Data Sources
  • API Docs
  • Updates
Data Sources: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data
Disclaimer: This site is an independent journalism project. Data analysis and editorial content are not affiliated with or endorsed by CMS or any government agency. All spending figures are based on publicly available Medicare payment records.
Sister Sites: OpenMedicaid · OpenFeds · OpenSpending

© 2026 OpenMedicare. Independent data journalism. Built by TheDataProject.ai

Methodology•Download Data
  1. Home
  2. Investigations
  3. The Lab Testing Duopoly
Investigation

Two Companies Control America's Lab Testing

And Bill Medicare Billions

February 21, 2026
14 min read
By OpenMedicare Investigative Team

When your doctor orders a blood test, there's a good chance it ends up at one of two companies: Laboratory Corporation of America (LabCorp) or Quest Diagnostics. Together, these two corporations operate 37 separate NPIs across the country and have billed Medicare $14.3B over the past decade — representing 25.0% of all clinical laboratory payments.

The Duopoly by the Numbers

$14.3B
Combined Medicare payments (10 years)
1.1B
Combined lab services performed
25.0%
Share of all clinical lab payments

LabCorp: 15 NPIs, $7.5B

LabCorp operates under 15 separate National Provider Identifiers across the country, each representing a different laboratory location. Their largest operation in Burlington, NC alone billed $2.2B over the decade — making it one of the single highest-billing NPIs in all of Medicare.

NPILocationTotal PaymentsServices
1538144910Burlington, NC$2.2B152.3M
1063497451Raritan, NJ$1.2B98.9M
1295726032Birmingham, AL$692.7M55.5M
1932184322Dublin, OH$659.2M54.4M
1659352276San Diego, CA$592.4M49.0M
1255314704Tampa, FL$463.1M37.4M
1740262880Phoenix, AZ$389.8M29.4M
1265418669Dallas, TX$389.6M31.8M
1881679751Houston, TX$299.4M24.7M
1073599478Seattle, WA$203.1M16.8M
1598747651Englewood, CO$139.3M12.1M
1750368700Research Triangle Park, NC$65.4M924.0K
1215914288Research Triangle Park, NC$61.5M960.3K
1699858373Knoxville, TN$56.9M4.6M
1285014282Overland Park, KS$47.4M4.2M

Quest Diagnostics: 22 NPIs, $6.8B

Quest Diagnostics operates an even more fragmented network with 22 separate NPIs. Their Tampa, FL location is the largest single NPI at $1.0B, followed by Clifton, NJ at $927.2M.

NPILocationTotal PaymentsServices
1891731626Tampa, FL$1.0B82.0M
1932145778Clifton, NJ$927.2M71.3M
1932166386Tucker, GA$599.2M43.7M
1538105366Phoenix, AZ$565.3M46.9M
1790721538Irving, TX$453.2M35.9M
1881630614Wood Dale, IL$446.2M34.4M
1518903350Miramar, FL$417.1M32.3M
1205872041Norristown, PA$340.6M26.7M
1245307818Baltimore, MD$318.4M26.3M
1326104613Houston, TX$311.2M26.1M
1194062448Marlborough, MA$276.5M19.9M
1952347791Marlborough, MA$268.6M21.1M
1043256886Las Vegas, NV$182.1M14.6M
1841236684Pittsburgh, PA$130.4M9.5M
1316983158Seattle, WA$97.9M8.3M
1619040284Pittsburgh, PA$73.7M5.9M
1225074065Melville, NY$71.7M5.5M
1487212551Greensboro, NC$69.3M6.0M
1780620526San Juan Capistrano, CA$48.8M1.8M
1346389764Schaumburg, IL$47.1M989.6K
1174569909Wallingford, CT$45.8M4.5M
1447296272Chantilly, VA$37.8M989.5K

Is This a Monopoly Problem?

Clinical laboratory testing is a $57.2B Medicare market over 10 years, with 29.8K total providers. But those numbers are misleading — the vast majority of those providers are small hospital labs and independent pathology groups.

LabCorp and Quest don't just share 25.0% of Medicare lab payments. In the commercial lab market — the reference testing that doctors order and send out — their combined market share is estimated at over 50%. They set pricing, they negotiate with insurers, and they define turnaround times that independent labs must match or beat.

The Scale Advantage

$31.34
Industry avg payment per service
$13.02
LabCorp/Quest avg payment per service
$1.9M
Industry avg payment per provider NPI
$386.1M
LabCorp/Quest avg payment per NPI

The Independent Lab Squeeze

For every LabCorp or Quest mega-laboratory, there are thousands of independent labs competing for a shrinking share of Medicare reimbursement. The Protecting Access to Medicare Act (PAMA) of 2014 fundamentally changed lab reimbursement by requiring CMS to set rates based on weighted median private payer rates — rates largely set by LabCorp and Quest through their massive insurer contracts.

The result: independent labs saw Medicare reimbursement rates cut by 10% or more in successive years, while the two giants — with their economies of scale — could absorb the cuts. Critics called it a "death spiral" for independent labs. The American Clinical Laboratory Association fought the cuts, and Congress delayed full implementation multiple times.

The Case for Scale

Defenders of the duopoly argue that scale brings benefits: faster turnaround times, broader test menus, consistent quality standards, and lower per-test costs. A LabCorp reference lab in Burlington, NC can process millions of specimens per year with automation that a small independent lab simply can't match.

And at $13.02 per service, LabCorp and Quest actually bill below the industry average of $31.34 per service. The cost efficiency argument has merit.

The Case Against

But consolidation in any market raises concerns. When two companies control the majority of reference testing, they also control:

  • Pricing power — their private payer rates become the benchmark for Medicare reimbursement
  • Test availability — they decide which esoteric tests to offer or retire
  • Data monopoly — with billions of test results, they hold unparalleled population health data
  • Acquisition strategy — both companies routinely acquire independent labs, further consolidating the market

What the Numbers Don't Show

Our data captures Medicare Part B fee-for-service laboratory payments. It doesn't capture:

  • Medicare Advantage lab billing (a growing share of Medicare)
  • Commercial insurance laboratory revenue (the majority of their business)
  • Direct-to-consumer testing (a fast-growing segment)
  • COVID testing revenue (which was enormous for both companies in 2020-2022)

The $14.3B in Medicare payments we can see is likely just the tip of the iceberg. Both companies report annual revenues exceeding $15 billion, with Medicare representing a meaningful but not dominant share.

The Bottom Line

Two companies, 37 NPIs, $14.3B in Medicare payments. Whether you see this as efficient consolidation or dangerous monopolization depends on your perspective. What's undeniable is the scale: in a healthcare system where most providers bill Medicare thousands or tens of thousands per year, LabCorp and Quest bill billions.

Disclaimer: This analysis is based on publicly available CMS Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data. Payment figures represent 10-year totals (2014-2023) for Medicare Part B fee-for-service claims only.

Related Investigations

🏢 Corporate Medicine📊 The Specialty Monopoly💰 Medicare's Biggest Billers🔧 The Markup Machine
Share:

⚠️ Important Context

All data on this page comes from publicly available CMS Medicare payment records. Unusual billing patterns may reflect legitimate medical practices (such as high-volume drug administration where each unit is counted as a separate service), data reporting differences, or group practice billing. Inclusion on this page does not constitute an accusation of fraud or wrongdoing. Only law enforcement and regulatory agencies can determine whether billing patterns represent fraud. Providers flagged by our statistical model have billing patterns similar to previously convicted providers, but many may have perfectly legitimate explanations.

Data Sources

  • • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) — Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data (2014-2023)
  • • American Clinical Laboratory Association — PAMA Impact Analysis
  • • LabCorp and Quest Diagnostics Annual Reports

Last Updated: February 2026

Note: All data is from publicly available Medicare records. OpenMedicare is an independent journalism project not affiliated with CMS.