OpenMedicare
Start Here
Explore
Fraud
Investigations
Data
Tools
About

Footer

OpenMedicare

Independent Medicare data journalism

Sister Sites

  • OpenMedicaid
  • OpenFeds
  • OpenSpending

Explore

  • Providers
  • Procedures
  • States
  • Specialties
  • Search

Fraud Analysis

  • Still Out There (AI)
  • Fraud Overview
  • Fraud Watchlist
  • Deep Dive Profiles
  • Impossible Numbers
  • Report Fraud

Investigations

  • The Algorithm Knows
  • How We Built the Model
  • Internal Medicine Crisis
  • Florida & California Fraud
  • Million Dollar Flagged
  • All Investigations

Tools

  • Provider Lookup
  • Compare
  • Cost Calculator
  • Your Medicare Dollar
  • Downloads

About

  • About OpenMedicare
  • Methodology
  • Glossary
  • Data Sources
  • API Docs
  • Updates
Data Sources: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data
Disclaimer: This site is an independent journalism project. Data analysis and editorial content are not affiliated with or endorsed by CMS or any government agency. All spending figures are based on publicly available Medicare payment records.
Sister Sites: OpenMedicaid ยท OpenFeds ยท OpenSpending

ยฉ 2026 OpenMedicare. Independent data journalism. Built by TheDataProject.ai

Methodologyโ€ขDownload Data
  1. Home
  2. Providers
  3. Shaya Ansari
๐Ÿ“ก
MDIndividual

Shaya Ansari, MD

NPI: 1003851726
Albuquerque, NM
10 years of data
Diagnostic Radiology
$4.7M
Total Payments
51.7K
Beneficiaries
54.6K
Services
7.26x
Markup Ratio

Peer Comparison

99th
percentile in specialty
This provider$4.7M
Specialty median$115.6K

๐Ÿ“‹ Key Findings

1Billed $4.7M over 10 years
27.26x markup ratio (above median)
399th percentile in Diagnostic Radiology by payments
4Payments surged 335% in 2019
518 procedures with >3x markup
โœ“ No flags detected

๐Ÿ”Ž Data Analysis

This provider's $4.7M in total Medicare payments ranks in the 99th percentile of Diagnostic Radiology providers nationally.

Their average markup ratio of 7.26x is significantly above the specialty median of 5.4x.

Medicare payments to this provider grew 680% from 2014 to 2023.

AI-generated analysis based on Medicare payment data.

Annual Medicare Payments

Annual Services Provided

Avg Payment per Service

Markup Ratio Over Time

๐Ÿ“ˆ

Notable: Payments increased 335% in 2019

Year-over-year payment surges can indicate changes in practice volume, new services, or billing pattern shifts.

Submitted Charges vs. Medicare Payments

Average per-service amounts submitted by the provider compared to what Medicare actually paid โ€” the gap represents the markup.

YearAvg SubmittedAvg PaidMarkup RatioGap per ServiceTotal PaymentsServicesBeneficiaries
2014$163.92$29.305.59x$134.62$142.1K4.1K3.8K
2015$154.77$29.025.33x$125.75$143.5K4.0K3.7K
2016$94.63$27.413.45x$67.22$158.7K4.6K4.2K
2017$96.89$28.663.38x$68.23$150.0K4.8K4.4K
2018$925.05$122.827.53x$802.23$132.4K1.1K1.1K
2019$1.1K$166.876.44x$907.16$576.4K4.4K4.2K
2020$716.10$115.286.21x$600.82$677.6K6.1K5.8K
2021$741.77$131.155.66x$610.62$864.3K8.1K7.8K
2022$660.93$89.887.35x$571.05$765.8K8.7K8.4K
2023$776.99$103.437.51x$673.56$1.1M8.9K8.4K

Top Procedures (20)

78815Nuclear medicine study with CT imaging skull base to mid-thighโš  7.3x markup
$1.1M
1.6K services$731.05/svc7.31x markup
74177CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with contrastโš  7.2x markup
$849.5K
7.0K services$121.04/svc7.23x markup
74183MRI scan of abdomen before and after contrastโš  12.1x markup
$386.0K
1.9K services$204.43/svc12.06x markup
74176CT scan of abdomen and pelvisโš  6.0x markup
$333.4K
4.6K services$72.01/svc6.02x markup
A9588Fluciclovine f-18, diagnostic, 1 millicurie
$232.8K
86 services$2.7K/svc1.86x markup
74178CT scan of abdomen and pelvis before and after contrastโš  7.5x markup
$218.5K
1.8K services$119.23/svc7.49x markup
71260CT scan chest with contrastโš  11.2x markup
$157.2K
2.0K services$78.40/svc11.23x markup
76536Ultrasound of head and neckโš  5.5x markup
$131.1K
2.6K services$50.40/svc5.52x markup
71250CT scan chestโš  8.3x markup
$126.2K
2.3K services$54.88/svc8.26x markup
72197MRI scan of pelvis before and after contrastโš  15.3x markup
$124.2K
664 services$187.01/svc15.27x markup
A9595Piflufolastat f-18, diagnostic, 1 millicurie
$115.1K
162 services$710.55/svc2.83x markup
A9552Fluorodeoxyglucose f-18 fdg, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 45 millicuriesโš  3.7x markup
$86.8K
732 services$118.62/svc3.67x markup
76700Ultrasound of abdomenโš  6.6x markup
$82.2K
1.4K services$57.81/svc6.62x markup
78816Nuclear medicine study with CT imaging whole bodyโš  7.1x markup
$57.0K
50 services$1.1K/svc7.09x markup
74170CT scan abdomen before and after contrastโš  7.6x markup
$55.7K
530 services$105.05/svc7.61x markup
76770Ultrasound behind abdominal cavityโš  6.0x markup
$48.9K
1.2K services$41.16/svc5.98x markup
71271Low dose ct scan of chest for lung cancer screeningโš  6.1x markup
$40.6K
529 services$76.83/svc6.12x markup
93971Ultrasound scan of veins of one arm or leg or limited including assessment of compression and functional maneuversโš  4.5x markup
$38.5K
2.0K services$19.46/svc4.53x markup
77067Screening mammographyโš  4.5x markup
$34.8K
286 services$121.67/svc4.49x markup
93970Ultrasound scan of veins of both arms or legs including assessment of compression and functional maneuversโš  4.2x markup
$31.2K
1.1K services$27.43/svc4.15x markup
Show detailed table โ–พ
CodeDescriptionServicesPaymentsAvg/ServiceMarkup
78815Nuclear medicine study with CT imaging skull base to mid-thigh1.6K$1.1M$731.057.31x
74177CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with contrast7.0K$849.5K$121.047.23x
74183MRI scan of abdomen before and after contrast1.9K$386.0K$204.4312.06x
74176CT scan of abdomen and pelvis4.6K$333.4K$72.016.02x
A9588Fluciclovine f-18, diagnostic, 1 millicurie86$232.8K$2.7K1.86x
74178CT scan of abdomen and pelvis before and after contrast1.8K$218.5K$119.237.49x
71260CT scan chest with contrast2.0K$157.2K$78.4011.23x
76536Ultrasound of head and neck2.6K$131.1K$50.405.52x
71250CT scan chest2.3K$126.2K$54.888.26x
72197MRI scan of pelvis before and after contrast664$124.2K$187.0115.27x
A9595Piflufolastat f-18, diagnostic, 1 millicurie162$115.1K$710.552.83x
A9552Fluorodeoxyglucose f-18 fdg, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 45 millicuries732$86.8K$118.623.67x
76700Ultrasound of abdomen1.4K$82.2K$57.816.62x
78816Nuclear medicine study with CT imaging whole body50$57.0K$1.1K7.09x
74170CT scan abdomen before and after contrast530$55.7K$105.057.61x
76770Ultrasound behind abdominal cavity1.2K$48.9K$41.165.98x
71271Low dose ct scan of chest for lung cancer screening529$40.6K$76.836.12x
93971Ultrasound scan of veins of one arm or leg or limited including assessment of compression and functional maneuvers2.0K$38.5K$19.464.53x
77067Screening mammography286$34.8K$121.674.49x
93970Ultrasound scan of veins of both arms or legs including assessment of compression and functional maneuvers1.1K$31.2K$27.434.15x

Markup Analysis

Charge-to-Payment Ratio

7.26x

This provider submits charges 7.26 times higher than what Medicare actually pays.

What This Means

A markup ratio of 7.26x means for every $100 Medicare pays, this provider initially charges $726. This is higher than the national average.

Location

Albuquerque, NM

Provider Verification

Always verify provider credentials and location before scheduling appointments. This data reflects Medicare payments and may not include all practice locations.

Related

Browse
โ† Back to Provider Directory
State
All providers in NM โ†’
Specialty
All Diagnostic Radiology providers โ†’
Tool
Compare this provider โ†’
Analysis
Fraud Watchlist โ†’
Search
Search all providers โ†’

Share This Provider

Share this provider's Medicare payment information

Share:

Data Sources

  • โ€ข Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
  • โ€ข Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data (2014-2023)
  • โ€ข National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES)

Last Updated: February 2026 (data through 2023, the latest CMS release)

Note: All data is from publicly available Medicare records. OpenMedicare is an independent journalism project not affiliated with CMS.

Believe this data is inaccurate? Dispute this data